luka
Well-known member
The frustrating thing is they shouldn't need a magic bullet. The guy's openly done plenty of things which should be enough to end his presidency.
i agree. im not defending him.
The frustrating thing is they shouldn't need a magic bullet. The guy's openly done plenty of things which should be enough to end his presidency.
Trump's corruption is only unusual in its openness and degree, tho even there it's not unprecedentedThe guy's openly done plenty of things which should be enough to end his presidency
Trump’s opponents on the Left and the Right, Frum wrote, needed to set aside political purity and to start thinking strategically. If Trump represents a unique threat to liberal democratic norms, constitutional protections, minorities and so forth, then his removal from office should be the sole focus of his opponents’ political activity. Neither the mass mobilization of peaceful demonstrators nor riots on college campuses would achieve this end; the former is rarely politically effective, and the latter would be positively counter-productive. Instead, activists should identify a single issue on which Trump is vulnerable and then unite behind a straightforward demand, ideally one that can be met with the passage of legislation. As important, opponents of Trump on the Right and the Left must be willing to subordinate all other political disagreements in pursuit of this shared goal.
they didnt find that he was literally a manchurian candidate, but theres certainly collusion, plenty of instances to allude too. And what he was actually impeached for was another thing entirely and perfectly self evident, just didnt pas for partisan reasons.You keep using the word corruption. But Dem impeachment cases didn't go anywhere for a reason. They didn't find the collusion they were after.
I dont see how you can call it the entire foundation when they impeached him on something else. And there was plenty of evidence for collusion in the mueller report, just, again, nothing to indicate that Trump was living out the plot of a John Grisham novel. I'm not of the mind that Russia's influence on the election was all that dramatic, but its fairly obvious the Trump campaign has extremely inappropriate ties to Russia.I don't think there's strong evidence for Russia/Trump collusion, I think that's pretty well-established post-Mueller report. Maybe the facts on the ground will change, but the best public evidence says no.
Remember, that attack is the entire foundation for the Dem challenge
I dont see how you can call it the entire foundation when they impeached him on something else. And there was plenty of evidence for collusion in the mueller report, just, again, nothing to indicate that Trump was living out the plot of John Grisham novel. I'm not of the mind that Russia's influence on the election was all that dramatic, but its fairly obvious the Trump campaign has extremely inappropriate ties to Russia.
I don't really care how an inept democratic party markets itself. Trump has plenty of legitimate transgressions. Im not going to allow my disdain for liberals to prevent me from acknowledging that.Yeah it was, "We've been promising our constituents blood for 2 years, we better give em something if we wanna be reelected"