subvert47
I don't fight, I run away
Subvert's going to be gutted.
Nah, it's good news to wake up to
Subvert's going to be gutted.
Eh, hadn't heard about that - doesn't sound great. Was it anti-Indian-government (which is fair enough, it's pretty terrible), or anti-India in general, or anti-British-Indian-people?I don't think Labour conducted themselves very well in their campaign either judging by that anti-Indian leaflet they put out.
Eh, hadn't heard about that - doesn't sound great. Was it anti-Indian-government (which is fair enough, it's pretty terrible), or anti-India in general, or anti-British-Indian-people?
Ugh, that's exactly the sort of shit Galloway's been pulling for years.Well it was a bit more nuanced than that, but that actually makes it worse: it was anti-Hindu!
Basically a picture of Johnson shaking hands with Modi beneath the message: āDonāt risk a Tory who is not on your sideā.
Ugh, that's exactly the sort of shit Galloway's been pulling for years.
You're right, I was being much too generous with that phrase.It's not tone deaf, it's purposefully mendacious and cynical.
What was that?They had to waive a fairly basic rule in order to get her in there.
Is it really controversial to suggest that a lot of Muslims aren't all that keen on Jews, though? And would the Guardian be wringing its hands in this way if anyone had suggested that a lot of Jews aren't too keen on Muslims, or that a lot of non-Jewish white people aren't that keen on Jews or Jews, both of which are true?"The risks to the Labour party of being so empty have been much discussed. But it is high time we also considered the risks to the rest of us of having an opposition that wonāt oppose those who aim to destructively remake British society; of having the main progressive political party in this country pandering to the worst kind of regressive politics. The failures we see notched up daily by Starmerās team arenāt just political: they are moral."