Thanks for asking.tell us more!
What do you guys do?
Last edited:
Thanks for asking.tell us more!
You're missing the point, I'm talking about how it's used regardless of its actual qualities.No, I can’t commit to that, sorry, but do agree that the film has in the past been used as a measure 📏 by many extolling the virtues of that type of thing. Can’t say more without re watching. What do you think is great about it?
pretty much but I dont think its fully conscious, or at least Im not intrested enough in intention to investigate it like that. I just think thats what its doing, unknowingly or not.Then it boils down to whether it was conscious/ commenting with/ on structure or not.
You think it was fully consciously commenting on the current vacuous person taken up with/ propelled by VR landscape video game, who is at the same time its originator, as the autistic demi god (maybe like someone who works at google since Silicon Valley has a high percentage of autism families).
Bladerunner we know was conscious because the hero is still modernism’s anti hero. But why is the word postmodern not allowed here?
nothing as exciting as that. luka and woops are street performers thoughThanks for asking. Right now I feel like L in a big way so
What do you guys do?
Are they the poets?nothing as exciting as that. luka and woops are street performers though
You keep committing the intentional fallacy which implies you subscribe to a premodern view of art so decidewhy is the word postmodern not allowed here?
Yes it is used to describe a work of cinematic quality - is that what you mean?You're missing the point, I'm talking about how it's used regardless of its actual qualities.
I don’t understand your sentence, can you say it in easier words or more words?You keep committing the intentional fallacy which implies you subscribe to a premodern view of art so decide
Yes. And the point of this thread is to find its opposite.Yes it is used to describe a work of cinematic quality - is that what you mean?
What?Yes. And the point of this thread is to find its opposite.
I think hes referring to the theory (i.e. "The Death of the Author", "What is an author?") that textual interpretation doesn't necessarily need to be determined by the intentions of the text's author. No longer is hermeneutics governed by the transcendent author, according to those who may consider this a watershed moment in literary theory.I don’t understand your sentence, can you say it in easier words or more words?
Yeah just a few production assistant credits, and some presumably uncredited feature screenplay coverage.@Clinamenic I think is the only other film industry insider
presumably uncredited?Yeah just a few production assistant credits, and some presumably uncredited feature screenplay coverage.
What is screenplay coverage?Yeah I don't think all those scripts went into production, and I don't think people who provide screenplay coverage get screen credits. I could be wrong though, or perhaps it differs across productions.
Wow that’s intense. Whereabouts?I would just read scripts and fill out forms that made it easier for producers to gauge whether or not the film is worth producing any farther. I would provide synopsis, character descriptions, ratings on various bases such as commercial viability, etc. I would also provide a bunch of structural and content-based feedback for improving the script, such as making character motivations more robust, etc.