Trump

G

GhostofKinski

Well-known member
JWC said:
Not a Marxist myself but I'd guess being familiar with dialectical materialism aka dialectical reason aka "marxism" (and Hegel), would help.
Click to expand...
Thanks, I’ve read a lot of Marx. But, without the context of Hegel I think I’m probably missing a lot. I was thinking of buying one of those Rius type books: introducing Hegel, Hegel for dummies, lol. If you have a suggestion as a starting point, it’s much appreciated. Thanks!

Oh, just noticed you’re a new member.
Welcome!!!
 
william_kent

william_kent

Well-known member
GhostofKinski said:
Thanks, I’ve read a lot of Marx. But, without the context of Hegel I think I’m probably missing a lot. I was thinking of buying one of those Rius type books: introducing Hegel, Hegel for dummies, lol. If you have a suggestion as a starting point, it’s much appreciated. Thanks!

Oh, just noticed you’re a new member.
Welcome!!!
Click to expand...


don't worry about Hegel, he was a racist shit full of crap about our African friends
 
G

GhostofKinski

Well-known member
Are you serious? If so it’s fine. I’ve gone through more than half my life without knowing his work and I’m still here.
JWC is not the first member to suggest guzzling some Hegel though.

And I’m sorry, I’m ashamed to ask. Have you been officially diagnosed and/or anointed as a Marxist on here? It’s a thing Y’know?

I, myself has been definitively diagnosed a social democrat,…but I got the “eye of the tiger” ambition to make into the red league.
 
william_kent

william_kent

Well-known member
@GhostofKinski


I self identify as ANARCHO PUNK / NEW AGE TRAVELLER HIPPY / MDMA LOVE CABBAGE / LSD CASUALTY ? DMT PROPHET / SELLOUT

fuck labels man

but Hegel: racist as fuck:

In Negro life the characteristic point is that consciousness has not yet attained to the realization of any substantial objective existence—as for example, God, or Law—in which the interest of man’s volition is involved and in which he realizes his own being … The Negro … exhibits the natural man in his completely wild and untamed state. We must lay aside all thought of reverence and morality—all that we call feeling—if we would rightly comprehend him; there is nothing harmonious with humanity to be found in this type of character.
Click to expand...

^ from Hegel, "philosophy of history"

seems pretty racist to me

"nothing harmonious with humanity " wtf

edit: and the cunt is sexist to boot, lol
 
G

GhostofKinski

Well-known member
william_kent said:
@GhostofKinski


I self identify as ANARCHO PUNK / NEW AGE TRAVELLER HIPPY / MDMA LOVE CABBAGE / LSD CASUALTY ? DMT PROPHET / SELLOUT

fuck labels man

but Hegel: racist as fuck:



from Hegel, "philosophy of history"

seems pretty racist to me

"nothing harmonious with humanity " wtf
Click to expand...
Not disagreeing but can. You not find analogus (.is that a word 3rd?) about the Irish & every other fuckn Vic of capitalist countries colonialism buggering of any nation?
 
william_kent

william_kent

Well-known member
GhostofKinski said:
Not disagreeing but can. You not find analogus (.is that a word 3rd?) about the Irish & every other fuckn Vic of capitalist countries colonialism buggering of any nation?
Click to expand...

?

not quite getting this?

HEGEL calls our AFRICAN FRIENDS "subhuman" * and you want to argue?

* - technically HEGEL says that non white people have "nothing harmonious with humanity", but whatever
 
G

GhostofKinski

Well-known member
You should read George FitzHugh: ‘
Cannibals All’

As repugnant as his arguments, arguments they remain.
Persuasive to some even today.
Do you deny the collective consensus of the English as ubermenchen to the Irish race?
 
T

thirdform

pass the sick bucket
GhostofKinski said:
Are you serious? If so it’s fine. I’ve gone through more than half my life without knowing his work and I’m still here.
JWC is not the first member to suggest guzzling some Hegel though.

And I’m sorry, I’m ashamed to ask. Have you been officially diagnosed and/or anointed as a Marxist on here? It’s a thing Y’know?

I, myself has been definitively diagnosed a social democrat,…but I got the “eye of the tiger” ambition to make into the red league.
Click to expand...

he was spectacularly racist but his logic is seminal and worth a read. but given your lack of aptitude for algebra, I'm not sure how much of it will land. but maybe if you culturally convert to islam, abandon alcohol, and guzzle 9 cups of coffee daily...
 
G

GhostofKinski

Well-known member
thirdform said:
he was spectacularly racist but his logic is seminal and worth a read. but given your lack of aptitude for algebra, I'm not sure how much of it will land. but maybe if you culturally convert to islam, abandon alcohol, and guzzle 9 cups of coffee daily...
Click to expand...
Never!

Edit: not the algebra par. No argument.
Not the Islam part. No religion
But you of all non terrestrial beings suggest total abstinence from the water of life? Never gonna happen. Like your society
 
other_life

other_life

bioconfused
also even if the thought "we must remake society on the basis of love [or this love; less mistaken]" is mistaken, it does not mean that "this love" is less worthy nor that they [those with this particular odd thought] will not remake society. it is a motive force [definite prosocial and productive relations between militants] but it is not the means [x] nor the basis/fact of it [society bound together by free* association in productive work...

*which is/that is free of both impersonal/un-personing exploitation and exploitation through/disguised as personalist obligation (also: precisely not the sort of love that hounds people to remake society)]
 
G

GhostofKinski

Well-known member
other_life said:
also even if the thought "we must remake society on the basis of love [or this love; less mistaken]" is mistaken, it does not mean that "this love" is less worthy nor that they [those with this particular odd thought] will not remake society. it is a motive force [definite prosocial and productive relations between militants] but it is not the means [x] nor the basis/fact of it [society bound together by free* association in productive work...

*which is/that is free of both impersonal/un-personing exploitation and exploitation through/disguised as personalist obligation (also: precisely not the sort of love that hounds people to remake society)]
Click to expand...

So, what you’re saying is,…. You’re breaking up with me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top