Who loves ya, baby?
Has anyone spent much time on this? HMGovt? Tea?
You don't leave much room for debate and I don't know enough physics to counter what you say. Nor have i had the opportunity to read the Neuroquantology paper yet.C'mon though, surely that stimulated *some* thought!
Not an unreasonable comparison, I admit. But fudging a theory as elegant and successful as general relativity to make it fit empirical data is very unattractive too, I think.The ballooning of dark matter to account for the shortcomings of gravitational cosmology reminds me of pre-Keplerian epicycle proliferation.
Just read through the Unified Spacememory Network paper, and while I can safely say that the overwhelming bulk of it is beyond me, what little I've read on this Haramein fellow I find interesting.C'mon though, surely that stimulated *some* thought!