I would imagine you would feel entirely subjected to the big other, as if any sufficiently authoritative figure could reach into you and eviscerate you without you being able to put up a fight. I would imagine quite the array of horrible complexes can spread from this, if we consider a complex as an arrangement of said invisible lens through which your experience is precognitively filtered.I ask a third time - WHAT IF YOU WAS NONCED,
AS A KID?
I will strategically and cheekily quote this at some pointIt's not bullying if it's funny
I know people are at least half-kidding but framing my comments this way is scary for me. There's an asymmetry of caricaturing and/or misinterpretation. If you take the progressive stance, the worst I can misinterpret you as is an overzealous promoter of good, selfless values. If you challenge the progressive stance, you can be read as racist, misogynistic.An interesting move of gus's is that when pressed he will always say something perfectly reasonable and measured but the second the heat is off he starts asking questions about the rate of black crime
I would imagine you would feel entirely subjected to the big other, as if any sufficiently authoritative figure could reach into you and eviscerate you without you being able to put up a fight. I would imagine quite the array of horrible complexes can spread from this, if we consider a complex as an arrangement of said invisible lens through which your experience is precognitively filtered.
edit: not sure if "big other" is the best term here. Not sure if I understand that concept properly.
We're going to do it more now that's how bullies workI know people are at least half-kidding but framing my comments this way is scary for me. There's an asymmetry of caricaturing and/or misinterpretation. If you take the progressive stance, the worst I can misinterpret you as is an overzealous promoter of good, selfless values. If you challenge the progressive stance, you can be read as racist, misogynistic.
It's not bullying if it's funny