Psychedelic Fascism

[shiels]

Stan has read art of war

 

[constant escape]

There are possible futures which involve the better life quality of the 99.9%, there are possible futures which involve better capitalistic arrangements for the 0.1%, and there are possible futures that qualify in both. The third category is much slimmer, but as far as I can tell still infinite. The thing is, the 0.1% have no incentive to seek out that overlap on their own accord, right?

 

[luka]

kill them then

 

[constant escape]

And any such project needs functional gnostics such as yourself @luka and yourself @shiels

 

[luka]

shiels doesnt want to be a gnostic anymore hes changed his mind he wants to be normal now

 

[constant escape]

And yes also scientists. Another category that shan't be killed.

 

[constant escape]

shiels doesnt want to be a gnostic anymore hes changed his mind he wants to be normal now

Is this true @shiels ?

 

[luka]

And yes also scientists. Another category that shan't be killed.

we're defintely killing them Stan, you promised.

 

[shiels]

If people start to believe that you can be a functional user of psychedelics without falling into bad hygiene or suffering losses of productivity, it actually seems like it could have profound impacts socially. If it becomes thoroughly normalized, that is. Normalized within the sphere of productivity. Psychedelic professionalism.

yeah the key point here is maybe that psychedelic fascism probably reveals an ideological indifference in terms of neuro chemical effects

no, thats pretty simplistic, its question of scales and sets and settings etc but moral ambiguity is a given?

the question again is productivity for what....

 

[constant escape]

Productivity to enable further degrees of productivity. As an engine that ought to better the existence of the 99.9% on their own terms. If it does not, then the engine is perverted, corrupt, according to the terms of the 99.9% (or at least the majority thereof).

 

[constant escape]

yeah the key point here is maybe that psychedelic fascism probably reveals an ideological indifference in terms of neuro chemical effects

no, thats pretty simplistic, its question of scales and sets and settings etc but moral ambiguity is a given?

the question again is productivity for what....

Not sure I understand the first two lines. What do you mean?

 

[Mr. Tea]

i dont think govt and global corps need to alter psychdelics chemically just the sheer fact of them giving the out will structure the experience itself making it evil and corrupt diseased

For several decades the only source of LSD in the world was Sandoz, where Hoffmann worked.

 

[constant escape]

we're defintely killing them Stan, you promised.

I promised no such thing. Scientism is a pole to be resisted, but science is complementary to gnosis, even if that doesn;t translate culturally.

 

[luka]

you promised Stan you said we could kill 'em.

 

[constant escape]

I understand you aren't fond of operating within factuality (science), and I understand that you are good at operating beyond it (gnosis), but we will not kill them. It is prohibited. You will effectively lose cosmic favor by doing so.

 

[luka]

it's not fair.

 

[constant escape]

We need practically infinite patience and tolerance, in terms of reaching some of these scientists, but such efforts will be well-rewarded.

 

[luka]

can we just kill a few of them?

 

[shiels]

Just that with a surface reading, the fact psychedelia seemingly sits comfortably with fascism somewhat confuses claims of any neuro chemical moralistic links ie tripping makes you a better person

 

[woops]

what about you woops, what are your worries about the future of psychedelia?

@Mr. Tea as Minister of Drug Taking