sus

Moderator
Derek Attridge's Rhythms of English Poetry is very good. I skipped the first part. The second and third parts are worthy.
 

sus

Moderator
I don’t think I even knew this thread existed and now I feel bad for not acknowledging it.
Not too late jenks you can come here and school a young whippersnapper. I've been thinking about rhythm a lot, meter, where it comes from, how natural it is, how much it varies across languages.
 

jenks

thread death
Not too late jenks you can come here and school a young whippersnapper. I've been thinking about rhythm a lot, meter, where it comes from, how natural it is, how much it varies across languages.
I think a lot about rhythm and structure when I teach poetry - mainly because so often students just want to talk about the 'meaning' rather than the manner in which it is written - the shaped and structured nature of a text.
In terms of how 'natural' it is - well, my guess is that it was essential when poetry first started - the necessity of rhythm as a memory device for the bards to be able to learn long poems/sagas.
In terms of now - in English verse reading there has definitely a move to a more 'natural' reading voice for poetry and most evident in the way Shakespeare's verse is read aloud - if you listen to old poets and actors there was definitely a more declamatory voice - something that sounds jarring to a modern ear. The idea that iambic patterns are more in keeping with conversational English has become a truism but reading the blank verse of Wordsworth against the same form by Frost feels very different rhythmically. Obviously the French tradition is different - based on syllables - @woops can correct me if i am wrong on this and i think this is partly based on the different stress patterning of individual languages.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sus
Top