It definitely has made things better. like the magna carta which peter hitchens cites in that article. the alternative is saying there are no human rights and there should be no laws attempting to protect human rights. how would that make anything better?
I'm not saying it's evolving in the sense you mean - that the entire species is somehow changing in any way.
the first thing I'm saying is that the moral structure that exists in our mind developed as part of human biology and is essentially the same for everyone as we are all the same species...
I think it's a structure that exists naturally in our minds as part of our biology, and the expansion of human rights reflects a growing ability to penetrate into that structure
'THEN I STARTED MAKING BEATS I HAD NUFF DUBLATES STARTED PLAYING AT NUFF RAVES THEN I PUT OUT A TUNE CALLED RAID ON WHITE LABEL WHEN I WAS 16 WAY BACK IN 98.'' - dj charmzy
this one doesn't sound like alice coltrane or new age etc to me. sounds a lot more like a detroit techno ambient interlude or something carl craig would do on an album track
Have to say though if youre not from a zionist jewish family that does seem weird to me. The points you make are often made by people who were indoctrinated in zionist propaganda from an early age. I sympathise with those people. But if you don't have that kind of emotional tie with no threat of...
Mixed biscuits thinks taking a position against something connotes bias. He thinks that if a jury finds a defendant guilty they are 'biased' against them
Mixed biscuits isnt interested in evidence. It doesn't matter what you show him. He's decided his position in advance (slavish worship of the Israeli state and steadfast commitment to cheerleading genocide) and will desperately cling to anything he can to support that position no matter how absurd.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.