Search results

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=BA9TRG89

(aren't the children emaciated?) next they'll think of casing a shark in formeldayhyde

that is always a problem with something is so affectvely denatured and anhedonic.........that track i uploaded is from the superb up!up!up! single, three tracks which render the album superfluous

their whole shtick is essentially a disthymic reduction of indie to the limit of ever so fucking wry nonsequiturs, anemic funk reheats, chugging chord progressions left hanging in thin air.....very funny sometimes too

though i've never got through an entire album of ggd

they're good anyway quite good like

hmmn yeah vacation by excepter is very good

hmmn

this one has good id3 for the latter you'll have to get the full lp, i suppose

nice a slightly arid quartet by toshio hosokawa this is where context is sort of superfluous since i can't remember anything about the composer and would have to just c&p off a search engine

http://www.egs.edu/faculty/zizek/zizek-superego-and-the-act-1999.html

seems like mediafire has no file expiry so probably best everyone uses that or something similar that way there is effectively an archive and the thread will be useful for those viewing later

not fond of rapidshare cos you have to complete the fucking security picture

then again maybe it should be even more clipped and tinny, to diminish the worst thing about the radiohead sound ie the numbing artisanal arrangements, everything in it's right place and no surprises

the mp3s are lame 393 js which isn't so crap, even at 160cbr, in that it's adequate for the purposes of working out what is attributable to the fm ready crap production and what is data loss all mp3s should really be at apx/v2 or 320cbr though

there never is that is, there never could be

has to be radiohead-in_rainbows-web-2007-h3rb innit the problem is the assymetry betweem the general estimation of radiohead as literally ESSENTIAL and that of those for whom radiohead were an adolescent passing ground hopefully towards finer things there's no use trying to consider any new...

sure! as long as the title is included or it's adequately id3'd then i think 2 and 3 are surplus (optional sure) cos ultimately CONTEXT could diminish FUN say someone posts a short dodecaphonic string quartet, and says 'x renegotiates all hitherto agreed upon tenets of western music, and as...

just for contributors to link to a single track each post, rather than a rar of the entire oeuvre of sun ra or whatever, and without an obligation to contextualise

swear you remind me of