Search results

i need a second opinion!!!.. whered all yall go? am i crazy? is this a joke?

how can i not call you crazy? the claims you make.. unbelievable.. and youve STILL offered nothing. other than peace as transcendental.

this is your example of violence? a doctor amputating a leg? im totally confused.

does their 'politics of the lack' not break the deadlock youre in for example? you just want vicious peace.. i do too. but we're stuck.. really, the act of 'naming the lack' inherent to the system can be a very non violent process..

?? opinion. say something, please..

your "Real" is univeral, no? but the worst kind of universal, its relativist. not every violence is equal, at least i dont think so. you need to think of violence beyond just bludgeoned heads.. im violated all the time by the systematic nihilism of capitalism.. this is violence to me.. the worst...

to explain further: why Stalin was a sack of shit = why parliamentary-capitalism is a sack of shit (both are a finitude, both contain the "not included subject"): lets take the notion of human rights, for example.. human rights is inherently linked to the power of the nation state, it fails to...

Lacan, Einstein, Paris Commune, Grateful Dead, ..... edit: the grateful dead bit was not serious.

why do you do this? you know theres a difference between event and Event.

is it at all possible to construct a Just Law? what if its a Law that 'absorbs' the Multiple? edit: we can even say, it feeds off the Multiple. i claim that communist ontology contains this 'module'.

me neither.. but how can you follow each Act to its finality.. you cant. this is inscribed in the Multiple itself..

i dont know how to change the world.. im stuck, but thinking.. i have ideas. for me, the hardest part is puncturing through the nihilism inherent in an ontology (the late capitalist kind) that simply leaves us with no options, in a deadlock (statements like: violence can never be used, ever. i...

if the means = the ends (i believe you said this somewhere), then we are in a perpetual deadlock.. how do we make any decisions?

nomad. i love you.. here we go... the Two does not imply only 'two' options politically (the Two describes the ontology itself, or its interpretation of dialectics.. and its a particularly 20th century ontology. we can even say, outdated?). this is the only reason why i started posting here...

where did i say communists never killed anyone? badious claim is that 'thinking the impossible' (being towards the Two) simply rearranges the coordinates of possibility. there is no 'essence' involved. edit: the separation of the 'betrayal' from the 'Truth', as i said, was not do deny the...

is this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_Philippe_P%C3%A9tain not a problem?

i was rereading the thread to get some coherence back in my head.. i think theres been some misunderstandings.. specifically on difference.. im sorry for not being clearer here, i didnt pick this up when i read it first time.. yes, we cant overcome difference (overcome was the wrong word. i...

"Communism has been identical to fascism, in every historical incarnation of it so far." - Nomad defend this! delusional i say.. edit: i will put together a list of these at some point. amazing.

you would not kill a nazi? well, they would kill you, no problem. ustase came to my grandfathers village, made them dig their own graves, and shot them in the forest.. they killed almost the entire village of 250 people.. the villagers did nothing but be Serb. they were living peacefully...

i understood it was a joke.. of course.. the 'camps' were a joke! ill get back to you on your humanism.. i have to go work. and ive no idea where youre from.. relax. just a lil predictable, thats all. most of your posts have been so crazy, i seriously seriously thought that you were just...