Search results

Exactly, I agree entirely! I am just on the other side of this struggle: Punk must be wiped off the surface of the earth. A brain drilling, rude, uncultivated, moronic power cord racket. The Beastie Boys made hip hop inelegant. If it is indeed translation, then you need a refined and cultivated...

being a moral centre is a butthurt denial of life, suitable for envious weaklings.

The whole labour of the ancient world gone for naught : I have no word to describe the feelings that such an enormity arouses in me. And, considering the fact that its labour was merely preparatory, that with adamantine self consciousness it laid only the foundations for a work to go on for...

the west will surrender without a single shot being fired.

that's the problem with malelesbians pluralism, it makes white people get full of themselves. now its their time to be colonised and experience that misery.

if malelesbian was a brother from stratford he definitely wouldn't manage to like hip hop and indie simultaneously. Americans need to bully their white brothers more, force them to submit to the elegance of the soul boy continuum. none of that punk bizniz!

they brought execrable white boy frat boy rock aesthetics into hip hop.

the beastie boys ruined hip hop anyway. if it weren't for them every tom dick and harry malelesbian wouldn't have pretensions to being rappers. It's a bit like when you see a white rasta called Henry barrington Melleville de le nance. Just wrong.

sad to say this malelesbian my good old chapesse, but he's right. White people are incapable of having rigid, disciplinarian standards, including yer good self.

@malelesbian please help this lost soul.

@malelesbian you're needed to show hmg some unconditional love, sugarplum. I'll leave you to it. Extract him from the manosphere!

Mate, you really don't wanna know who lurks this place because if you did you'd be mortified.

you know the answers to all these questions. don't take people for fools, this ain't reddit eli5.

Maybe you should take some time out to make sense of it? But to answer your question, no. But there is a hypocrisy of saying I'm against the patriarchy, yet support the family, given that the institution of the family is the bulwark of patriarchy. and the reason for this being that steps taken...

prigozhin is dead.

Except this isn't about womens spaces, cis or otherwise. If it were, those against 'transactivism' wouldn't be so adamant that parental responsibility is necessary to protect the kids from the medical profession and big pharma. It's all about playing to a minority of womens feelings (fine) but...

netmums > mumsnet, but you middle class goa smelly crusty wouldn't get that. Also thanks for outing yourself, the male lesbian double in your head refuses to do so. maybe you need to go for an exorcism.