the victorian aesthetic is gross in general.
its amazing to think that the 1800's was a whole century without a single person producing anything of any artistic merit.
Not really into novels, poetry, essays, plays, sculpture or architecture, then?
the victorian aesthetic is gross in general.
its amazing to think that the 1800's was a whole century without a single person producing anything of any artistic merit.
Don't get me wrong, Bart, I do enjoy a sweeping statement. But you just junked Balzac, Turner and the Brompton Oratory and I can't have that.
the victorian aesthetic is gross in general.
its amazing to think that the 1800's was a whole century without a single person producing anything of any artistic merit.
the victorian aesthetic is gross in general.
when you look up your favourite musicians, poets, authors or painters from the 18th or 19th century and dig into their lives you find so often that they lived like some sort of vagabonds. not always poor, but often so. they go and roam from early age on, live in a shack in france, being fed by an old lady who recognizes the talent. do some sort of apprenticeship under the supervision of some skilled master in italy. form alliances, break up alliances, fight duels. it always feels like they have lived a 100 years in just 10 years. i'm always wondering what would be the modern equivalent of that sort of life. an artist residency in new york?