actually speaks a lot to my theory of dividing the hardcore continuum into people who think it's blade runner or not.
two competing ideas of the future. one clinical, one with humanity. one about how sex and violence and love and dancing and sentimentality interact with increased technological advancement, the other is, at its heart, music about touchscreen worktops and floating cars.
I thought about that, but I couldn't think what to pit it against.
actually it'd be good to pit something against refugee cru's terminator, because i have no idea why that track gets the adoration it does.
NWA - it's aged much better, albeit Chuck D as a person > anyone from NWANWA vs. Public Enemy. PiL vs. Pistols. Wiley vs. Dizzee. Sly & The Family Stone vs. Funkadelic. Beefheart vs. Zappa. Beatles vs. Beach Boys. Neil Young vs. Bob Dylan.
I stick by what I saidHe changed the world with his music at an unprecedented level
I'd be pretty surprised if Dissensus didn't go heavily for RZAMadonna vs. Kate Bush. Primo vs. RZA.
as I said, it's a decision everyone has to make for themselves, in relation to any artistI must be honest I don't have the slightest qualms in listening to him had never occurred to me till Padraig mentioned it
no. I don't have any "policy". it's case by case.Do you have the same policy for every musician who has a bad rep? Like James Brown?