I think Droid is consistently overoptimistic about Trump's imminent downfall. It's a persistent trait I've noticed.
I don't think credible accusations of child rape will bring him down, for various reasons.
I think Droid is consistently overoptimistic about Trump's imminent downfall. It's a persistent trait I've noticed.
The remarks about him getting turned on by the girl looking like his daughter are beyond gross but also entirely believable.
Both Republics and Democrats are funded by billionaires, right? So what actually separates the two parties - is it just a comparitively superficial difference over race, gender and sexuality?
To me it's kinda obvious that Trump only values women for their looks and perceived desirability - so he can use them as a kinda of scoring system when competing with other men. So when he compliments his daughter he only has the vocabulary of going on about what a stunner etc not that he doesn't want to fuck her, he probably does, it's just that he doesn't have the brains to disguise that by saying other things about her cos he doesn't know other ways in which women can be good.
Would Sanders be popular enough to win?
Former Vice President Joe Biden currently leads Trump by 9 points, the widest margin among the top four Democratic contenders. That’s well outside the poll’s margin of error of 3.5 percentage points.
Biden’s large lead over Trump is largely thanks to his performance among potential tossup voters. He has a 6-point advantage among suburbanites and a 4-point lead among independents.
Sen. Bernie Sanders leads Trump by 7 points and Sen. Elizabeth Warren has a 5-point advantage over the president.
Sen Kamala Harris leads the president by just a single percentage point -- a tossup -- despite having risen to third place in the field of Democratic candidates among those who intend to vote in the primary.
Jeffrey Epstein, the wealthy financier accused of sex trafficking, planned to develop an improved super-race of humans using genetic engineering and artificial intelligence, according to the New York Times.
In the aftermath of his 2008 sex trafficking conviction, Epstein hoped to seed the human race with his DNA by impregnating women at his ranch in New Mexico, one of his properties where young women, including minors, were allegedly abused, the newspaper reported in a major investigation.
Though there is little evidence the scheme ever progressed beyond fantasy, prominent scientists, including the late Stephen Hawking, regularly attended dinners, lunches and conferences held by Epstein, the Times said.
Epstein’s plans around his own progeny began to be talked about in the early 2000s, according to three sources contacted by the Times.
“Epstein told scientists and businessmen about his ambitions to use his New Mexico ranch as a base where women would be inseminated with his sperm and would give birth to his babies … Mr Epstein’s goal was to have 20 women at a time impregnated at his 33,000-sq-ft Zorro Ranch in a tiny town outside Santa Fe,” the Times said.
According to the paper, Epstein’s circle included the molecular engineer George Church; Murray Gell-Mann, the discover of the quark; the evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould; the neurologist and author Oliver Sacks; and the theoretical physicist Frank Wilczek.
On one occasion, Epstein held a lunch at Harvard’s Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, a program he had helped fund with a $6.5m donation. In 2011, he gave $20,000 to the Worldwide Transhumanist Association, a project that now operates as Humanity Plus.
The Harvard cognitive psychologist Steven Pinker said he considered Epstein as an “intellectual impostor”.