Doesn't look like it mentions the efficacy of masks in blocking virus transmission.Read that paper, perhaps?
Right, but you are, as usual, totally evading the point.It does talk about oxygen and carbon dioxide levels tho
gives you plenty of time to enjoy those candy-floss clouds though, as you sail over seas of lemonade.I once went on an ocean voyage with sails made of wool and let me tell you, it took a lot longer than I had anticipated.
The point isn't whether or not they have any measurable effect on airflow, but whether they have enough of an effect to harm your health. Medical-grade masks, which I'm sure are much more airtight than the cheap cloth masks you can buy in a supermarket, are worn by surgeons for hours on end. That's not a job you'd want to do if you were delirious from hypoxia.Are you people seriously entertaining the idea that the same amount of gaseous oxygen, water vapour and carbon dioxide pass in and out, regardless of whether there's a mask in the way?
Is this why sailing ships didn't work?
That aspect of it was good, woops, absolutely.gives you plenty of time to enjoy those candy-floss clouds though, as you sail over seas of lemonade.