mixed_biscuits
_________________________
Delta variant considerably less bad - the variant the UK gvt is using to keep lockdown for another month... (https://assets.publishing.service.g...ariants_of_Concern_VOC_Technical_Briefing.pdf


Still waiting for an explanation of how They benefit from endless lockdowns, beyond simple recreational evil. Or how They somehow managed to co-opt virtually the entire medical establishment.Pay close attention to the infection rate and other indicators as the lockdown extension nears: the ruse they use is to implement lockdown as either infections have hit their peak or cases/deaths have passed the point of inflection in growth. This gives the impression lockdown made the difference.
I'm not trying to talk you into having it! I was just putting the risk (which applies almost entirely to women, anyway) in context.I'm not on the pill though mate, I am just working shifts and typing on the internet. I've made my own mind up about the Oxford one and that's pretty much how it is
There is a civic duty in all this, which I'm behind, wouldn't want to be the vector of someone else's grief through transmission etc.
I'm just saying I wouldn't have accepted that jab as I don't believe that this is the only problem with it. Not trying to get into some back and forth about it
Still waiting for an explanation of how They benefit from endless lockdowns, beyond simple recreational evil. Or how They somehow managed to co-opt virtually the entire medical establishment.
Not that I'm holding my breath.
Quite. Given that infectious respiratory diseases spread through close interpersonal contact, a denial that reducing the amount of close interpersonal contact people have is obviously going to slow the spread of such a disease amounts to a denial of germ theory.Honestly, though, I'm borderline impressed by the idea that governments around the world are not only inexplicably interested in pissing semi-infinite amounts of money away by shutting their economies down but are also correctly identifying every time the (previously unseen) virus is going to suddenly stop infecting people for no scientifically explained reason and timing their lockdowns to make it look like the irrelevant fact that you've massively reduced the amount of close contact that people have with each other is responsible instead. The "lockdown causes more damage than the virus would" brigade are being thick-headed, but I guess that at least it's not an inherently implausible idea, whereas convincing yourself that lockdowns have no impact at all must take dedication.