IdleRich
IdleRich
Funny that all the MAGA cunts have been saying nothing else but "Release the list" for ages, baying for blood and sharpening their rifles, but it really does look as though Trump is gonna be implicated at least as much as anyone else and certainly way more than Biden so suddenly they've shamelessly switched to becoming the most rigorous checkers - every release is greeted with people demanding proof that it is actually from the docs and then when that is provided there is a questioning of the credence of the person who said it. Funniest of all is when they keep saying "why is this coming out now?" er maybe just cos all of you cunts have done nothing but demand it all day every day for months - only to disown it whe it doesn't say what you wanted it to.
A lot of what we are getting is court transcripts and so the background documentation is only going to prove it was discussed in court, it won't contain the proof unless the proof was produced in court. They must surely have known this before-hand though. So if witness X said Trumped bummed her up the ass then that itself does not constitute proof of it having occurred, but at the same time the lack of evidence for any given statement is not some unexpected weakness.
To me the main point is that either way it's not a great luck if lots of witnesses say you're a paedo and it's exactly what MAGA was hoping would appear except only accusing Biden, Obama, Clinton etc in which case they would have lost their collective shit claiming that it constituted absolutely cast-iron evidence.
I wonder if there is any truth in this one though... if so you'd think it ought to really chuck a massive fucking wildcat in with the pigeons
A lot of what we are getting is court transcripts and so the background documentation is only going to prove it was discussed in court, it won't contain the proof unless the proof was produced in court. They must surely have known this before-hand though. So if witness X said Trumped bummed her up the ass then that itself does not constitute proof of it having occurred, but at the same time the lack of evidence for any given statement is not some unexpected weakness.
To me the main point is that either way it's not a great luck if lots of witnesses say you're a paedo and it's exactly what MAGA was hoping would appear except only accusing Biden, Obama, Clinton etc in which case they would have lost their collective shit claiming that it constituted absolutely cast-iron evidence.
I wonder if there is any truth in this one though... if so you'd think it ought to really chuck a massive fucking wildcat in with the pigeons