Sounds like a few different Wire songs, but not one in particular. Yet made it their own
I change it and now it's like the terrible title of a horrible 19th century noveltruly terrible.
Corpsey is notorious for stealing other peoples thread ideas. he'll wait a couple of months and then present it as his new big idea.
Didn't they actually say in an interview that they set out to make a song that sounded like Got To Give It Up? After that they were always gonna be struggling to claim any resemblance was coincidental. For what it's worth I didn't think that they were that similar.didnt the blurred lines trial ruin this for everyone?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-46550714
I think that that is an important point. Cos there is (potentially) so much money in hit songs there is a lot of time and effort put into proving whether a song did or did not rip off another (or, I think, a good defence is if you can prove that there was another earlier song that is similar to both) and so we end up thinking that the truth of the relationship between tune A and tune B is the same as the result of the legal conclusion but really that's only part of the story.I think the problem with this conversation not just to do with the title of it is that so much of it is framed and built around the legality of sampling/borrowing/stealing that you can't just discuss the use of what songs are used or why .
Fair point. I always hold a totally unreasoned animosity to Costello but I think he's exactly spot on here.Brutal, a track on Rodrigo's number one album, is based around a punky chord sequence that also featured in Costello's 1978 hit Pump It Up.
But when a Twitter user said Rodrigo's song was "pretty much a direct lift", Costello replied: "This is fine by me.
"It's how rock & roll works," he wrote. "You take the broken pieces of another thrill and make a brand new toy."
He added: "That's what I did."
The veteran singer-songwriter also included hashtags referencing Bob Dylan's 1965 classic Subterranean Homesick Blues, which inspired Pump It Up; and Chuck Berry's 1956 single Too Much Monkey Business, which influenced the Dylan song.
But does it change your opinion in any way now you know that he just nicked it from a horror film?God that prelude is so good.
e.g. Killing Jokes Eighties in relation to Come as you areI think that that is an important point. Cos there is (potentially) so much money in hit songs there is a lot of time and effort put into proving whether a song did or did not rip off another (or, I think, a good defence is if you can prove that there was another earlier song that is similar to both) and so we end up thinking that the truth of the relationship between tune A and tune B is the same as the result of the legal conclusion but really that's only part of the story.
interested to know why? too smart for his own good or is it just his singing voice both are valid imoFair point. I always hold a totally unreasoned animosity to Costello but I think he's exactly spot on here.
But I like the post-modern way that the title both anticipates and deflects that, although sadly it's been changed for a more generic one now.truly terrible.
Corpsey is notorious for stealing other peoples thread ideas. he'll wait a couple of months and then present it as his new big idea.
I was gonna say "no reason" but actually I do remember one thing that annoyed me. Aaaaages ago there was a new release of Beatles songs, in fact two releases, one was red and one was blue. I guess they were remastered versions of the singles or something I dunno. But I remember that when it came out there was a queue to get the cd in HMV or whatever and Elvis Costello stayed up all night to be first in the queue at HMV Oxford Street or something - I just remember thinking "what a prick, who has to performatively stay up all night to buy a load of songs he has already just so we all know what a big Beatles fan he is". I'm not saying that that is the basis of it but I genuinely found that annoying. I mean, do you reckon that he even listened to it when he got home? Perhaps a couple of songs and then... probably thought, you know what I know all this anyway, maybe skip to Tomorrow Never Knows and file away in the collection, the main thing was for everyone to see me buying it after all. Though I might be being totally unfair, perhaps he welded it into his cd player and he listens to it every day ten times.interested to know why? too smart for his own good or is it just his singing voice both are valid imo
OK I obviously asked that in a silly way, but when you find out that something you really like is effectively copied from something else then does it spoil it for you? Or decrease your opinion of the artist you previously thought was wholly responsible? For me the answer that it certainly can do. It depends on to what extent they've changed it and so on. I don't remember what thread it was but I remember recently talking about songs where essentially someone has taken someone else's song and reissued it as their own with absolutely minimal changes.But does it change your opinion in any way now you know that he just nicked it from a horror film?
yes but i thought that was meant to be part of the charm and why we all loved him. Although i have to ask who is "we?" in this scenariotruly terrible.
Corpsey is notorious for stealing other peoples thread ideas. he'll wait a couple of months and then present it as his new big idea.