version
Well-known member
What I will say is I'm of a similar mind to him in that I think the film is above all about the tension between cowardice and pride in men who want to be like gods.
Take notes, Elon!
What I will say is I'm of a similar mind to him in that I think the film is above all about the tension between cowardice and pride in men who want to be like gods.
watch your mouthTake notes, Elon!
We're the middle children of history, man. No purpose or place. We have no Great War. No Great Depression. Our Great War's a spiritual war... our Great Depression is our lives.The film bros are spreading
The affective response is the bottom line, and because people are different something can be too much for one person and too little for someone else. It's a masterpiece for you because you think it's a masterpiece but it may not be for other people.I get frustrated talking about Oppenheimer at this point because every time I do I feel like people are projecting onto it very hard. Everyone who dislikes it dislikes it for very different, sometimes even opposite, reasons and their evidence seems to always be so based in their affective response that they often ignore evidence concretely to the contrary of their take. I've heard people say they hated for being too in Oppenheimer's head, which is certainly the worst take I've heard but I think that and the idea that we don't get enough of his interiority are both off the mark. I think it's a masterpiece, but I am generally quiet about this because I have yet to be able to fully articulate why I think so, and this is why I'm more interested in the observations of its nuances by people who loved it, like kc's. What I will say is I'm of a similar mind to him in that I think the film is above all about the tension between cowardice and pride in men who want to be like gods.
Sir Kenneth Branagh's frankly blood chilling Russian oligarch.
But version should watch Tenet for Sir Kenneth Branagh's frankly blood chilling Russian oligarch.
Patty, maybe the fact that Biscuits is your ally here should set off some alarm bells.You WILL like Oppenheimer! If you don't you're a fascist!
Sus has no ripostes to my posts in the angry thread so he gets what meagre satisfactions he can.Patty, maybe the fact that Biscuits is your ally here should set off some alarm bells.
There's a difference between an affective response and a misreading of the text, which is why I referred to it as projection. Not my fault you people don't know how to watch a movie!The affective response is the bottom line, and because people are different something can be too much for one person and too little for someone else. It's a masterpiece for you because you think it's a masterpiece but it may not be for other people.
Also I already have the correct take on Attack which is that it's the second best film of the seriesWhen people try to argue others round to a different appreciation of a film, they're not concerned so much with changing the film's appreciation as changing the person whose mis-appreciating it.
This a hallmark of the authoritarian personality.
p.s. speaking of which, @sus hurry up and post the rest of your Attack of the Clones thing to change everyone's minds about it i.e. change them into people who are of the right minds.