or the dearth of black british music in the charts, at least
http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,,5384219-103425,00.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,,5384219-103425,00.html
HELL_SD said:...and yeah it helps (alot) if you're white
Raw Patrick said:The problem with that article is that just about every point about how the industry works could be applied to indie, or white (as the terms are used fairly interchangably throughout) music as well. Tons of post-Doherty Libertines-alike bands have been quietly dropped for example. Or their singers have been sent into the Big Brother house to avoid it (maybe Lethal Bizzle should go in there next time.)
HELL_SD said:Maybe I'm way off cos i just don't get brit pop and indy guitar stuff...dunno eh ???
qwerty south said:there's an interview on blade691.com where hh producer baby j calls his songs that he produced for skinnyman 'black music'. they are both white as a polo mint.
maybe he is referring to the music he samples to make the songs (sly and the family stone for 'no big thing') and black drummers' beats and hits?
minikomi said:without white people to bring black slaves to america and oppress them there'd be no rock n roll / gospel / blues, therefore all music is white music. . .
HELL_SD said:...and yeah it helps (a lot) if you're white
Well, there were a lot of complaints about the absence of successful indie bands. It bothers me a bit when black / white and indie / urban are used as equivalent divisions, but there is a pretty noticeable correlation...blunt said:But then, I don't recall seeing many articles bemoaning the absence of white faces in the charts during the late 90s / early 00s, when 'urban' sounds were comparitively in vogue![]()
On Dissensus? Surely not!bassnation said:aren't we guilty of changing the rules to suit whatever argument is being made at the time, to exclude music we don't like and to confer hipness on the music that we do?