I'm just gonna bang this out while I think about it even though its not really related to the last parts of this thread. (I won't be upset if no one replies!)
On other parts of the board theres been some talk (some on my part) of the demise of the ol' NME as a credible journalistic/critical soundboard, instead, hardening via its reputation into a stumbling block in the interface between the alternate and mainstream music worlds.
Just reading The Last Party by John Harris, (might put up a thread about it next week) and quite an obvious point is made about the general state of rock journalism toward its climax. In that, as Britpop morphed the anti-mainstream, rarefied climate of indie into a pop explosion, there became less and less reason to talk about it in critical terms. Especially as the tunes were leap frogging the weeklies straight into the daytime radio laps of Moyles/ Evans et al. In the celebration of the Britpop moment, the NME began to be merely more than cheerleaders, and have never really recovered since. To some extent, this unquestioning style has seeped into music journalism in general. Witness the witless rise of music coverage in the Sunday Supplements. The reason why Vice is such a hit is because it actually dares to be rude and objectionable about people/music acts. (Although its snidey obnoxiousness for obnoxiousness' sake is a different reason not to read it.)
.......