Just bought a copy off ebay for $10. You can borrow it if you like when I've watched it - assuming it turns up of course.I've never actually seen Deadlock - I believe it's fairly hard to get hold of?
Keoma eh? Never heard of that, tell me more."PAT GARRET & BILLY THE KID ! - Sublime soundtrack
KEOMA !! - hilarious soundtrack!
CUT THROATS 9!!
McCABE & MRS MILLER!
THE GREAT SILENCE!!!!!!! - awesome soundtrack!!!"
Okey-doke, I'll let you know when I have it.Oh yeah, i'd love to borrow that, cheers.
The Last Picture show isn't a western or acid. I reckon you mean The Last Movie actually, the Dennis Hopper thing. I've never seen it either unfortunately.
Ah well, I'd really like to see that film. I mean, I'm sure it's bollocks but if anyone has a copy I'd be eternally grateful and I'll send you something nice...."Yes it was the Hopper thing I had in mind. Just wanted to join in with all the fun really."
As I understand it the first acid western is generally considered to be The Shooting directed by Monte Hellman and staring Warren Oates and Jack Nicholson (did I mention I like this film?). Not as weird or hallucinatory as all that but the mysterious plot leaving so many unexplained questions combined with the fact that you don't really know who anyone is or what they want leaves viewing this as a thoroughly odd experience.
Glad you liked it - it seems we have very similar taste."what a film!"
Well I thought that there was a certain inevitability to it turning out that the person they were chasing was his disappeared brother (if I'm remembering correctly - I need to see it again to be honest). But it left so much unanswered; why were they chasing him?, what's that stuff about a "little person"?, what actually happened in the incident that gave the film its title? I was thinking about it for ages afterwards for sure."i was somewhat flummoxed by the end though as warren oats was again wearing different clothes in the same scene (reminded me of two lane blacktop). took me a while to realise he was playing his twin.
i can't decide if hellman purposely cast twin brothers during the dying seconds of the movie to fuck with our minds, or whether it just hadn't been thought through properly? in which case it could be misconstrued as poor screenplay? whatever the reason i loved it."
Hmm, not sure. I like Django Kill but it's not the same type of film at all. It's weird but in a very different kind of way. I'd love to see more things like The Shooting although it's quite tricky to find films like that because it's very hard to put your finger on what it is that makes it unusual. Did you check out The Passenger? My friend has loaned me another Monte Hellman film called Backdoor To Hell and I'll report back when I've seen it - apparently it's not the same kind of thing but it has some Hellmanesque touches so we'll see."where next idle rich? django kill? !!"
Glad you liked it - it seems we have very similar taste.
Well I thought that there was a certain inevitability to it turning out that the person they were chasing was his disappeared brother (if I'm remembering correctly - I need to see it again to be honest).
But it left so much unanswered; why were they chasing him?, what's that stuff about a "little person"?, what actually happened in the incident that gave the film its title? I was thinking about it for ages afterwards for sure.
Did you check out The Passenger? My friend has loaned me another Monte Hellman film called Backdoor To Hell and I'll report back when I've seen it - apparently it's not the same kind of thing but it has some Hellmanesque touches so we'll see.
Cool - thank the guy who recommended them to me. I'm hardly an expert on film although become a bit obsessed with it the last year or so - very much still learning though."i'm pretty amazed tbh, as i'm really REALLY fussy.
those three hellman recommendations really have bee top draw! can't thank you enough. you can go through your whole life and not see/find films like these.
i'm a late starter when it comes to film (never had a vhs player until much later in life) so have missed out on a lot, so any schooling is gratefully appreciated. and tbh i've always had trouble with film/tv, cause it's so hard to come by the good stuff."
Yeah, the ending (despite what I said earlier) is somehow very sudden and unexpected. In fact, it's not clear exactly what happens is it?"for sure, it's just the quick camera shot of two different warren's in quick succession that fried my head."
That Flight to Fury looks interesting. I like the way the review is all cagey, saying "an ulterior motive" and "dangerous web of deceit" all the way through and then just gives it away at the end by asking who will get the diamonds."this box set looks like great value. contains three hellman films."
"Joe Gaines (Dewey Martin), becomes entangled in a dangerous web of deceit when a satchel of jewels enters his life. After meeting the outgoing Jay Wickham (Nicholson) in a casino, Joe beds a beautiful woman, only to find her murdered when he gets out of the shower. Jumping aboard a small plane headed for the Phillipines, Joe is shocked to discover that Wickham has tracked him down. Another passenger, Lorgren (Vic Diaz), and his gorgeous girlfriend, Destiny Cooper (Fay Spain), appear to have ulterior motives for getting close to Joe. When the airplane crashes in the jungle, leaving only a few survivors, everyone's true colours shine through. A battle ensues, leading to a final duel between Joe and Wickham, deciding once and for all who - if anyone - will keep the diamonds for themselves..."
I can't recall the specifics but this is what it says on wikipedia."i don't recall the 'little person', i must rewatch it again another time when i've completely forgotten it. the dialogue and accents were at times hard to follow."
I think that you can basically construct a story of what happens in the film from all the maybes. It could be as simple and prosaic as: Oates' brother and his friend go to town and (accidentally) kill a child, a friend or relative (the woman) comes for revenge and shoots one of them with the other running away so she then pays Oates to follow him with some backup from the bounty hunter. They then catch up with him and have a shoot out."Willet Gashade (Oates), a former bounty hunter, returns to his small mining camp after a lengthy absence and finds his slow-witted friend Coley (Will Hutchins) in a state of fear. Coley explains to Gashade that their partner, Leland Drum (B. J. Merholz), had been shot to death two days before by an unseen assassin. The killing was possibly committed in revenge for the accidental trampling death of “a little person” in town, which may have been caused by Gashade’s brother, Coin. Coin had inexplicably rushed away from their camp moments before the shooting death. Gashade and Coley become increasingly paranoid, and Gashade takes his friend’s gun away from him."
I think that you can basically construct a story of what happens in the film from all the maybes. It could be as simple and prosaic as: Oates' brother and his friend go to town and (accidentally) kill a child, a friend or relative (the woman) comes for revenge and shoots one of them with the other running away so she then pays Oates to follow him with some backup from the bounty hunter. They then catch up with him and have a shoot out.
Of course this doesn't explain many things - amongst the most obvious of them, why does the woman shoot her horse at the start? Also why does everyone refer to a little person rather than a child?
why does the woman shoot her horse at the start?
Well that's certainly the obvious interpretation but part of what I love about the film is the way that you really can't say anything with any certainty. Almost everything is up for grabs."yeah it did dawn upon me that whoever died in town was somehow related to the woman. i thought one of the clues was outed during the scene whereby gashade digs a grave for coley and the woman for the first time is clearly distraught."
Nice one. Kind of glad it concentrates more on the process of making the films and their general feel without really explaining them too much. I don't think I want that."great hellman interview here."
Nice one. Kind of glad it concentrates more on the process of making the films and their general feel without really explaining them too much. I don't think I want that.