william kent
Well-known member
How many here have ever really been invested in the mainstream and how many of us retroactively realised some of it was actually quite good years after the fact?
Conflict is okay Corpsey you don't have to apologize the important thing is "where do we go from here" lead us to the promised landApologies as usual I've opened Pandora's box and then wandered away to have a lie down
I was being quite flippant in the original post and in the follow up saying all those things are bad
I think it's all a fascinating mixed bag. E.g. you might think a mainstream of music is lame, tending towards mediocrity, and even coercive -- but there must be something to be said for a musical mainstream, in terms of providing common cultural touchstones, for example...
Anyway the intention of the thread isn't to argue that THE INTERNET HAS RUINED MUSIC, despite that initial unfortunate framing of it
"Undoubtedly"the mainstream is undoubtedly worse which is bad as thats the ambient sound of your public life and it separates you from your fellow man to a degree but outside of that the internet is great for music
2001 A space odyssey was once the biggest movie of the year. The wasteland was mass cultural event."Undoubtedly"
defend this word choice. What is your basis besides intuition and solidarity
How many here have ever really been invested in the mainstream and how many of us retroactively realised some of it was actually quite good years after the fact?
feels youre fighting against someone else here- a Big Boring Platitude. I also think its obnoxious and obviously its more complex but I think its equally as reactionary to not acknowledge that mainstream culture is definitely worse. the idea that that every historical era is a just new coat of paint on the same factors feels as mystical as the boomer myth making of the past.Every generation thinks their era's mainstream is uniquely, unprecedently bad. Probably this should cause us to re-evaluate our intuitions and wonder about the processes of survival, curation, synopsis that lead to the effect Version describes, which is very important IMO
I agree that a big question "cultural decline: yes/no" is Big and Boring, which is why I am trying to stay focused on mainstream musicfeels youre fighting against someone else here- a Big Boring Platitude. I also think its obnoxious and obviously its more complex but I think its equally as reactionary to not acknowledge that mainstream culture is definitely worse. the idea that that every historical era is a just new coat of paint on the same factors feels as mystical as the boomer myth making of the past.
If we begin cherrypicking random media and years from the past century, I do not think we will make progress on the question "Why do we always love the pop music mainstream in retrospect, but never in the moment?"
That was your question version and it is the best question in the thread, stick by it
Padraig has sworn to be my nemesis, I only feel warm affection and brotherhood toward Padraigyou sound like youre sworn nemesis Padraig arguing that the NBA is exactly the same as its always been its just that inconsequential things have shifted atop an unchanging base equilibrium state
If we begin cherrypicking random media and years from the past century, I do not think we will make progress on the question "Why do we always love the pop music mainstream in retrospect, but never in the moment?"
Yes!!I imagine it's partly because after the moment it's escaped the machinery somewhat and can be taken on its own terms.