'Annapolis'
One word
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/us/politics/09web-cooper.html?partner=rss&emc=rss
One word
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/09/us/politics/09web-cooper.html?partner=rss&emc=rss
West Africa is perhaps Hizbollah’s most critical area of operation outside of the Middle East, with the group using the region for fundraising, recruitment and to operate gray and illegal businesses that help fund operations elsewhere....
Hizbollah benefits from established local networks, porous borders, poor internal security and limited state capacity to enforce regulations on the diamond trade.
In February 2009, the one-year anniversary of the Mughniyeh assassination raised fresh concerns for a possible Hizbollah attack on Israeli nationals and business interests. Israel has significant commercial interests across West Africa, and Israelis are heavily involved in the diamond trade on the continent. An attempted attack on Israeli diamond brokers in West Africa was rumored to have been thwarted in early 2008, and a second warning was issued later in August, prompting Israeli intelligence officials to visit the region.
The organisers of the 2009 UN Conference to promote antisemitism have declared themselves delighted with the first day of the Geneva conference yesterday. The keynote speaker, Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, "pushed all the right buttons", said a conference organiser. "To have the world's most famous Holocaust denier speak on the eve of Holocaust Remembrance Day? A masterstroke!"
I had no idea about Hizbollah's operations in Africa and its ties to the trade in "blood diamonds":
Looks like the conflict with Israel has the potential to spill-over into Africa if this report is anything to go by:
Israel Bombed Sudan
Israel's (outgoing) prime minister, Ehud Olmert, has pretty much confirmed the news -- first reported by CBS yesterday -- that Israel bombed a convoy of arms dealers in Sudan in January to destroy a reported shipment of weapons from Iran to Hamas."Israel hits every place it can in order to stop terror, near and far," said Olmert.
An analysis from Amos Harel in Haaretz says that Israel's concern was that Iran might be sending advanced missiles to Hamas:
A reasonable assumption would be that Iran sought to provide Hamas with Fajr missiles, whose deployment in Gaza would constitute what the IDF terms as "a weapon that shifts the balance." During the Gaza lull, Hamas smuggled Katyusha rockets with an increased range from 20 kilometers to 40 kilometers. If it successfully managed to obtain Fajrs, Hamas could have placed Tel Aviv within missile range, which is exactly the coup it has sought in an effort to create the impression of a victory over Israel.
I'm not sure if that is a "reasonable assumption" or not, though it isn't outlandish. But the raid, which reportedly killed between 30 and 40 people and destroyed 17 trucks, is a big deal, even though it occurred months ago, and it could severely destabilize Sudan, inflame relations between Arab countries, Iran, and the United States, and set the stage for a response by Iran.
Very droll Scott.
Apologies for not yet responding to your last post btw.
A positive development:
I'm sorry, but how is self-righteous bullshit from American politicians a "positive development"? leaving aside that it almost certainly won't be followed thru on.
Israel has to halt settlement construction.
The settlers are the main problem in Israel
Surely the fact that they've publicly said they'll "press the point" has to be positive - anything that restricts wriggle room.
Yes indeed. A real change from the Bush approach.