nomadthethird
more issues than Time mag
but i agree that hip hop, mostly, IS anti intellectual, does promote bad stereotypes, etc etc, but it also does a lot more and can work as brilliant music, that in the case of biggies first album, and countless others, is a lot more than that, despite BEING those things too. but all those things have a right to exist. and SHOULD exist on record. i would hate for someone like biggie to have censored himself or tried to present himself as morally upstanding when he isnt/wasnt (although the shitty new film tries to wash away a lot of the more unsavoury elements of his music and life). it shouldnt have to be just about the 'biggie' archetype or obama archetype.
Here's the thing about "promoting stereotypes"...
In the U.S., everyone knows that hip-hop dramatizes subjects, that like a lot of different art forms have in the past, it prefers the narrative or storytelling to the overtly political tome (usually). In the same way the Sopranos is a dramatization of a mafia family, but not, by any stretch of the imagination, an "exaggeration" of the sorts of things that go on in these families.
This makes instant sense to us because it is our culture, we grow up in it. We do not need old white British journalists to make sense of what's going on in hip-hop for us. We already get it.
If the LA riots had never happened, who knows? Would "gangsta" ever taken hold. In those very tense times, gangsta rap actually played an important role in tearing down stereotypes--that all black men are always aggressors and the cops are always in the right when they beat them down.