I have no idea. I suppose he may well have admired him. I know some people consider that Clausewitz may have added to the paranoia in Germany that led to WWI. But really Clausewitz describes how, even today, states think of themselves at war. He even describes, Zawahiri quote, e.g., how non-state terrorist groups think of themselves at war. How are we fighting of course begs the question, why are we fighting?
A bonus is that lately, because the dropout rate is so high for med school students who are under 25, they prefer to accept students who have work and real world experience. The average age of a first-year medical student is 30.
So moderation cuts across war? Shaping it, but not of it?
So moderation cuts across war? Shaping it, but not of it?
alright, but I dunno, I don't think all wars are like this...sometimes wars are fought for "limited" aims. I
Language is a form of moderation also. A form of media. They say the one thing which all three leaders of the Second World War shared - FDR, Stalin, Hitler - was a liking for Mickey Mouse.
Do you mean mediation or moderation here?
War is another type of social machine, another type of locomotive. It has structures, parts, magnitude, output...
What do you think Deleuze [1925-1995] would think about your use of his ideas?
"He would be enthusiastic, go wild over it."