can i make it clear i have no beef with people in the army, i just have beef with the diefication and untouchability of them, whilst other public servants are vilified in comparison to them (apart from nurses!)
can i make it clear i have no beef with people in the army, i just have beef with the diefication and untouchability of them, whilst other public servants are vilified in comparison to them (apart from nurses!)
- norfolk virginia -
![]()
i hear ya on this very important issue wrt our tabloids etc but how many public servants put themselves in harm's way to the extent a soldier does every day?
refusing to sign away his DNA as property of the US government
my apologies, i meant w specific regard to the British Army, who are managed by the UK govt agency the MoD and so are hence a public body.
no, he's right, soldiers still aren't public servants under that definition. the U.S. military is overseen by the DoD but civil service is specifically defined as everyone working for the government who's not in the military. it's the same in the UK, although you guys use the term "public/civil servant" informally a bit more broadly I think.
anyway, it was kind of a silly point to begin with b/c no one goes around comparing - detrimentally or otherwise - firefighters or nurses or even bureaucrats to soldiers.
do you know what year that was, roughly? I wonder if he was part of the Mayfield v. Dalton lawsuit. it's been mandatory since the early 90s that every service member provide a DNA sample. they're mainly used for identification of combat casualties in situations where fingerprints &/or dental records won't suffice but there is a kinda dubious special exception clause - enacted by Congress, not the military, following a rape at Fort Hood in 2002 - that allows the sample to be used for identification in prosecution of a felony or a non-felony sexual offense. in the lawsuit 2 Marines refused to give samples b/c they were afraid they might used to find risks for certain diseases & so on - which was never allowed under USMC policy (& which is explicity illegal following the GINA bill last yr). neither of them was, AFAIK, court-martialed. the case kinda simmered out cause they both went off active-duty & thus were no longer required to provide DNA samples. I don't know about a "movement" against it, but as a result of the case you can now have your DNA sample destroyed upon leaving the military.
I don't really have a problem w/any of it so long as everyone's clear about it going in. it makes sense for the military to have a DNA repository. I'm not crazy about the special exception clause but OTOH if you're not committing felonies or sexual assault you don't have anything to worry about.
my friend is Mayfield... i guess i remembered wrong they faced court martial but then took another route or something....
who do actually routinely vilify teachers, bureaucrats, etc and will often attempt to shut down debates about unions etc w an aside about 'look at our boys in Afghanistan, now you shut up, you greedy pinko'