So are you sort of saying that you can never step outside something and be objective?
If your mate really thinks "physics finds no place for experience (consciousness)" then he's ignorant of an entire century of wrangling over the measurement problem in quantum mechanics, to say nothing of the emergence of the field of quantum biology over the last few decades and its application to neuroscience.Life doesn't have to explain itself to science. Science can try to throw a net over natural phenomena but it can never capture theit inner reality. They always run out of the holes.
Here's what my mate Galen Strawson has to say about physics; biology is even worse
View attachment 3641
Nah, I've known of HMG's predilection for this sort of guff for a while.hahahahaa Mr. Tea thought he had a science ally but his science ally has gone to the dark side!
If your mate really thinks "physics finds no place for experience (consciousness)" then he's ignorant of an entire century of wrangling over the measurement problem in quantum mechanics, to say nothing of the emergence of the field of quantum biology over the last few decades and its application to neuroscience.
Prove it.science is Fake.
Yes! I demand that luka propose, and then carry out, an experiment that will prove, once and for all, the falsity of empiricism.Prove it.
Or at the very least excludes it to three sigma.Yes! I demand that luka propose, and then carry out, an experiment that will prove, once and for all, the falsity of empiricism.
I'm going to have to call [citation needed] on this claim!Quantum physicist of that stripe are smart enough to acknowledge the utter mystery of it all and are very often god-botherers.
Some are, same in any walk of life. But I wouldn't say "a lot".It is true that a lot of scientists are also religious and I do find that odd
NoNo, HMG is just yanking my chain.
I misread your post as "is it true...", rather than "it is true..."