Are you talking about the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, the one that produced no serious adverse effects when given to 543 volunteers?You're more likely to be impaired by the vaccine than the virus at this stage, Mr T.
You were talking about the known and unknown long-term effects of Covid.
Any vaccine administered imminently would have unknown long-term effects, empirically speaking.
You would be more likely to be impaired by the vaccine than by Covid not because the former is as dangerous as the latter but because you would be far more likely to have the former than the latter.
It's bed time for me now, but I'll reply tomorrow with an absolute belter, don't you worry.don't worry, he won't let it go.
It's bed time for me now, but I'll reply tomorrow with an absolute belter, don't you worry.
This isn't the only thing I've got to say, but for a starter: either the part in bold is bullshit, because your whole central argument is that "we're all going to catch it eventually" - or that argument itself is bullshit.You would be more likely to be impaired by the vaccine than by Covid not because the former is as dangerous as the latter but because you would be far more likely to have the former than the latter.
New Zealand lifted its lockdown two months ago today after a grand total of 22 deaths. Since then they've averaged about one new case per day. They've beaten it.
I honestly don't understand why some people are saying "we're all going to get it eventually" when I've never heard anyone saying this about any other infectious disease. They didn't say that about SARS-cov-1, which is more infectious than SARS-cov-2.
That doesn't contradict what I've written, does it?![]()
This has nothing to do with my comment on your relative riskWell this is rather at odds with "we're all going to catch it", isn't it? I mean, are we or aren't we?
Crisis resolved: Russian vaccine. It's been an interesting discussion, boys. Let's call it a wrap.