if its trivial it can hardly be other than indisputable, and therefore what's natural is everything and the distinction is nonexistent and not ideological at all.
if, on the other hand, the distinction is ideological then what's natural for humans is not trivial - it's a meaningful question about which one can disagree
You're in danger of losing your GREATEST LIVING ENGLISHMAN status if you let a little thing like that put you off!it'll have to wait till next summer. bit chilly now.
that's what I was trying to get at in my first couple of comments. it's not about whether something exists "in nature". it's about whether it's congruent to (a particular vision of) what it means to be human. it's always ultimately a normative statement, so can't be dismissed merely by listing counterexamples.Agree. if we define ourselves by what we exclude. Asking someone what they think is unnatural will tell you a lot about them, so chucking in ‘everything is nature’ is a useful way to get a feel for how ideology shapes reality, because you’re dealing with a kind of absolute rather than competing versions of what the world should be.
But yes it’s obviously a very meaningful distinction. It seems Fundamental to how we navigate the world, it is true that we can’t ever really get over it, we can make the move In the abstract but we can’t fully live it. apart from the enlightened ones
Of course! Why do science at all when you can learn all there is to learn by living on steak and doing drugs? 🤯Not likely. Evolutionary biology is classic midwit science.
Of course! Why do science at all when you can learn all there is to learn by living on steak and doing drugs? 🤯
You're a run-of-the-mill right-wing crank, part of a constellation of foolishness encompassing creationists, flat-earthers, anti-vaxxers, bell-curve racists, climate denialists, free-energy crackpots and many others. Although at least some of them have the quasi-excuse of being religious fundamentalists or in the pay of petrochem companies.I've "done science" for longer than you've been alive and come through the other side. Most 21st century science is utterly corrupt and compromised.
Actually it's the other way around, she's more conservative in that respectyouve only been once yourself cos your wife peer pressured you into it!