luka
Well-known member
Well of course there is. And there's a corresponding reaction from people who have a teenagers conception of freedom and can't accept the idea of limits to action based around a notion of the common good or even the common will. The teenage individualist notion of freedom. You can't tell me what to do. Both these types of people exist, and in large numbers. But who cares.
I was saying to Kumar how the virus literalises all sorts of arguments and metaphors and models and what was at the forefront of my mind was the way it undermines the libertarian individualist position. The extreme arguments for untrammelled individual freedom are exploded by the virus. Which is why it took care to infect Rand Paul.
You just can't get free of other people. They're like chewing gum stuck to your shoe.
View attachment 2825
Why? Partially because the available language of ethics is monopolized by emphasis on subjective moral intentionality and a self-regarding protagonism for which “I” am the piloting moral agent of outcomes.
The pandemic forced another kind of ethics. The Idealist distinction between zoē and bios as modes of “life” around which Agamben builds his biopolitical critique is a conceit that snaps like a twig in the face of the epidemiological view of society. Why did we wear masks? Because of a sense that our inner thoughts would manifest externally and protect us? Or was it because we recognize ourselves as biological organisms among others capable of harming and being harmed as such?

Agamben WTF, or How Philosophy Failed the Pandemic
As yet another wave of infection blooms and the bitter assignment of vaccine passes becomes a reality, societies are being held hostage by a sadly familiar coalition of the uninformed, the misinformed, the misguided, and the misanthropic. They are making vaccine passports, which no one wants, a...
worth a look