Again, not my problem you can't back it up. So it's still slander. Innocent until proven guilty, etc.
everything about this pseudo-racism I've alleged to have taken part in (by saying, what, I think Labour are the weak best of a truly bad bunch? by going on an antiwar march in my teens without having the sophisticated nuance of deep political thought and real lived-in experience?). It's not the same as sustained pointed trolling or directly telling someone they're "a faggot with no dick" - that's not someone missing an understanding of historic imperialism and its consequences (which is exactly where I'm at fault), that's just direct unpleasantness.
Being called a 'faggot with no dick' is still preferable to having the consequences of reactionary religious regimes and communities shoved down your throat daily. You can talk about gay men who refuse to out themselves being self-hating all you like, but you have no idea what your ignorance (and many labourites for that matter) of historical imperialism allows to slip by. If that makes me mean and insensitive, then sure, guilty as charged. As for labour being the worst of a bad bunch, that's patently false, this is just another white leftist lie. We don't see it like that. That's all I tried to say to you, that the lesser evilist dichotomy makes sense to people invested in a very white, parochial leftism. Something you're unwilling to acknowledge, because for you the tories are the fount of all evil, and this allows you to turn a side eye to labourist homophobia (which ironically increased in our communities during the new labour years) and sponsoring of reactionist communitarian leaders (which are of course highly patriarchal and homophobic) - a policy Blair was enacting long before the Iraq war. We all did stupid things as teenagers, but I'm mature enough to acknowledge them, whereas you seem incapable of. You want muslims and middle easteners to treat you nicely without being malicious, whilst you don't offer them the same courtesy. You are unwilling to acknowledge that any so-called decolonisation is going to be violent, and will hurt many things that white people hold sacred, including their facade of parliaments.
anyway I don't think this worth wasting any more of my own mental energy on, I think I'll just fuck off back to ILM, they might not have 2-step tunes or politically horizon-expanding debates, but it was never as unpleasant.
Again, I haven't engaged with you for months, so don't try to play the chivalrous card here.
As for ILM, if you want a monothought academic clique then sure, go back there.