Lads can you help me out i cant find the tweets oliver craner has made under that corbyn post i know he definitely would have done some cos he knows how i assiduously promote everything he does like his own personal cheerleader but i just cant seem to find it at the moment. it probably says something like OMG this is my old friend Luke, he's a genius, this is the audiobook of one of his most famous works you should defintely check it out its amazing!!!
Interesting - although worth noting that:![]()
YouGov sat on 2017 poll as it was too positive on Labour, claims ex-employee
Polling firm denies allegation it drew back from publishing some data showing Corbyn’s Labour doing well• Update: on 9 June 2022, Chris Curtis retracted his claim that the poll was suppressed [see footnote]www.theguardian.com
Curtis [...] said he believed the data was not published because the company was nervous about the consequences of being wrong, rather than because Zahawi had any hand in the situation.
“Given people are asking, I’m not saying that Nadhim directly had a hand in YouGov changing its results to suit Tory ends (as some have interpreted) but pointing to the general sense of panic YouGov had at the time which led to certain decisions,” he said.
Interesting - although worth noting that:
Not that I expect, for a nanosecond, that this will stop Corbynite Twitter deciding this was part of the universal anti-Corbyn conspiracy.
In fact, "YouGov is run by Tories so you can't trust anything they say" is a very common thing to hear in those parts, which is at odds with the fact that they were the only polling company to correctly predict a hung parliament in 2017, while all the others predicted the Tories would achieve an outright win with a comfortable majority.
Yeah man, Sunak's basically outflanked Sir Kevin by instituting full communism.But, ironically, perhaps none of it would've mattered cos since covid it's basically been a socialist government.
Why get involved then?It's an odd thing to say, but since Zahawi left the company in 2010, it would have been an empty threat even if made in earnest, wouldn't it?
They've spent more public money on the public than they'd like to, but come on. This is a ridiculous statement.But, ironically, perhaps none of it would've mattered cos since covid it's basically been a socialist government.
Oh, I'd thought catalog was joking...They've spent more public money on the public than they'd like to, but come on. This is a ridiculous statement.
No idea. From the Guardian article:Why get involved then?
When reviewed by others in the YouGov political team, it was clear that the sample of people who watched the debate significantly over-represented Labour voters from the previous election.
“We take our responsibilities as a research organisation seriously and we could not have published a poll from a skewed sample that favoured any party. No serious polling organisation would have published this."
The only people I've heard say it until now have been Tories who think Boris is too soft and the party isn't conservative enough.Oh, I'd thought catalog was joking...
Edit: I mean, I have heard people say more or less that, but it's so daft I thought his comment was a pisstake.