I think I’d totally have to concede that if I’m being consistent! Unfortunately, the people today who make appeals to Adorno in their cultural critique miss this point altogether, precisely because their conservative sensibility’s fealty to Art fears nothing more than ‘zoomers on tik tok’
yes, indeed. Communism stands above civilisation. the ruling class will never not pledge allegiance to the arts and traditions of this civilisation.

Another good idea from your letter, which I have had many times, is the chronicle of Italian and why not international opportunism. The "yesterday" sector of the Threads of Time, which some comrades wanted abolished, responds somewhat to this. Well, among the many little facts, I could talk about a controversy at the Socialist Youth Congress in Bologna in 1912 between the "culturists" who wanted, with Tasca, to reduce the youth movement to a little school, and the "anti-culturalists" who through me claimed full function for it politics and in the front row fighting against the reformist right of the time. I have always been anti-scholastic and anti-culturalist, and ever since then I have always been defined as a maniac of doctrinal rigidity and theoretical premises . Contradiction in me? No, the dialectical complexity of the problem, and the impossibility of reducing it to pills.
Therefore workers do not have to take courses in philosophy or anything else, but they only have to fight for their class. I remember that then, as usual touching on subtleties in the use of exact terms, it was said that I contrasted Tasca's culture with socialist "faith" and "feeling". In a certain sense it is like this: but it would be another serious mistake to see this as a shift away from healthy materialism. What I willingly deride is the "conscience" asked of every single class fighter: see Rome meeting and related schemes of Marxist praxis. First act as revolutionaries then understand and discuss: therefore instead of the individual (soldier or marshal) we have the class party.