thirdform

pass the sick bucket
The US is a nation so utterly devoid of self-importance, so blissfully unburdened by notions of identity, that its people drift through history in a state of serene, cultureless amnesia. Gone are the days when schoolchildren recited the Pledge of Allegiance with starry-eyed reverence—now, they awaken each morning, gaze blankly into the abyss, and feel absolutely nothing for the land of their birth. No national myths, no collective pride, no lingering attachment to that tedious concept of “America”—just a vast, featureless plain of atomized individuals, each more indifferent than the last.
And lo, it is this very void, this magnificent absence of cohesion, that shall render fascism impossible! For how could one build a nationalist movement when there is, quite simply, nothing to rally around? No shared heritage, no common culture, no unifying belief in anything beyond fast-food chains and tax brackets. The people—unshackled from the burdens of history, ethnicity, or any sense of belonging—shall remain forever immune to the allure of authoritarianism, floating serenely in the ideological ether, bound together only by their mutual agreement that America is nothing in particular and means even less. A truly impenetrable defense, if ever there was one!
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
the 'facism' thing is misleading i think. it's something else that's emerging. a new thing that we don't have a name for yet.
I think it meets at least 12 of Eco's 14 criteria:


One major difference is that fascism has historically required a strong state, whereas Trump, Musk and the rest seem to be intent on shredding the state to bits. That said, I don't see them defunding the police or ICE any time soon.
 

shakahislop

Well-known member
I think it meets at least 12 of Eco's 14 criteria:


One major difference is that fascism has historically required a strong state, whereas Trump, Musk and the rest seem to be intent on shredding the state to bits. That said, I don't see them defunding the police or ICE any time soon.
yeah maybe. but surely you misdescribe it when you use a word that describes something from the 1930s. it’s new it needs new vocabulary. does the historical parallel get us any closer to understanding. or is it tied into internet debates where everyone uses it to de-normalize what’s going on now / say that it’s bad serious severe
 

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
yeah maybe. but surely you misdescribe it when you use a word that describes something from the 1930s. it’s new it needs new vocabulary. does the historical parallel get us any closer to understanding. or is it tied into internet debates where everyone uses it to de-normalize what’s going on now / say that it’s bad serious severe
Well do you have a better suggestion?

I dunno, I think you're being a bit fussy here. The thing that a given word describes can change over time, can't it. A car from 100 years is pretty different from a car made today, but they have enough properties in common that it's reasonable to use the same word.
 

shakahislop

Well-known member
Well do you have a better suggestion?

I dunno, I think you're being a bit fussy here. The thing that a given word describes can change over time, can't it. A car from 100 years is pretty different from a car made today, but they have enough properties in common that it's reasonable to use the same word.
I'm writing bars on my phone in a file called Mr Tea War Dub
 

version

Well-known member
If this report's true and isn't some faction within the US government feeding the press disinformation, it's increasingly difficult to see any possibility other than Trump, or someone in his inner circle, being compromised in some fashion.

A recent memo at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (Cisa) set out new priorities for the agency, which is part of the Department of Homeland Security and monitors cyber threats against US critical infrastructure. The new directive set out priorities that included China and protecting local systems. It did not mention Russia.​
A person familiar with the matter who spoke to the Guardian on the condition of anonymity said analysts at the agency were verbally informed that they were not to follow or report on Russian threats, even though this had previously been a main focus for the agency.​

 

luka

Well-known member
you wonder how it works though dont you. if its just one man personally compromised how long before
thats identified and they decapitate him? and how has he managed to get a whole nation to go along with it?
 

version

Well-known member
you wonder how it works though dont you. if its just one man personally compromised how long before
thats identified and they decapitate him? and how has he managed to get a whole nation to go along with it?

He hasn't, really. The Democrats have been talking about him and Russia since 2016. He's got about 30% of a nation going along with it, although that's clearly enough for it to work.
 

luka

Well-known member
it would be a pretty big thing for the president of the united states to be a russian asset?!!
it would be sort of funny too in a way. like a bad airport novel.
 

version

Well-known member
The more of this stuff he appears to do, the fewer and fewer explanations there are beyond him being an asset. What other explanation is there for instructing the security services to just completely ignore threats from one of the two other global superpowers? I get that he supposedly wants a better relationship with Russia, but you can have a better relationship and still be somewhat pragmatic.
 

version

Well-known member
Here's another one, with the obvious caveat that you have to take everything with a pinch of salt and it's the New York Times.

The Trump administration is targeting government officials who had been flagging foreign interference in U.S. elections, despite ongoing concerns that adversaries are stoking political and social divisions by spreading propaganda and disinformation online, current and former government officials said.​
The administration has already reassigned several dozen officials working on the issue at the Federal Bureau of Investigation and forced out others at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, part of the Department of Homeland Security, they said.​
The cuts have focused on people who were not only combating false content online but also working on broader safeguards to protect elections from cyberattacks or other attempts to disrupt voting systems. In last year’s election, the teams tracked and publicized numerous influence operations from Russia, China and Iran to blunt their impact on unsuspecting voters.​

 
Top