bassnation
the abyss
its not much of a fuck you if its shit though.
LOL
its not much of a fuck you if its shit though.
prince is a bit hypocritical though - if it wasnt for the machine and the industry he would never be in the position he is in now. warners even built paisley park for him. obviously they profited from him as well, no doubt more than he did, but thats the nature of the business. hes lucky he was with a company that were in his corner for so many years and did so much for him. he wouldnt be anywhere near the position hes in today to make amazingly profitable deals with majors for shitty new albums if it wasnt for warners.
edit - looks like the mos sold an extra 600,000 copies cos of the giveaway. the retailers have a right to be annoyed then...
http://media.guardian.co.uk/presspublishing/story/0,,2128388,00.html
hmm, that makes it seem less punk and more like a cheap way of cashing in on Live Earthif he really cared about the environment - which is what the title is about - he would have just made it a download only thing).
the MOS is apaprently pissed off the sales of the paper arent eligible for the chart. not sure why it matters though - its not like theyre giving away the album every week are they? and they sell a paper, not the cd. shrewd/ahead of its time though this move might be, i cant help but feel it really does cheapen the album. giving away OLD albums is one thing, but brand new ones, shit or not, seems to render the music worthless and probably just another annoying freebie like 90% of all covermount CDs. cant imagine that many mail readers being into prince. they probably just chucked it away.
first the poor music retailers get slapped around, then the MOS sales don't register with the charts, now Prince's human rights are violatedI liked the MOS editor moping that it was a breach of Prince's human rights tho - these guys aren't overly concerned about being taken seriously are they.
hmm, that makes it seem less punk and more like a cheap way of cashing in on Live Earth
![]()
first the poor music retailers get slapped around, then the MOS sales don't register with the charts, now Prince's human rights are violatedit's a bloodbath
More generally, in many ways things are going back to go forward. In the 50s and 60s many performers saw records purely as a way of promoting their live appearances. Given the fact that they would make little to nothing from their record deals it was playing live which actually sustained them. Prince is in a similar situation but rather than selling out chicken shacks he's selling out stadiums.
The bigger picture is that it is not some law of nature that people have always and will always be able to make money from selling records: most artists didn't until the mid 60s, just look at the Beatles first contract to see why.
The business is clearly changing once again and those changes effect everybody from the 18 year old who puts his/her music up on myspace, where once he/she may have got a record deal, to ex-80s mega stars like Prince.
Fascinating times and the Prince CD is just one of the more obvious manifestations.
15th July (from Telegraph)High street music giant HMV was similarly scathing about the plans. Speaking before rumours of a giveaway were confirmed, HMV chief executive Simon Fox said: "I think it would be absolutely nuts. I can't believe the music industry would do it to itself. I simply can't believe it would happen; it would be absolute madness."
HMV has been dubbed a traitor by industry insiders for its decision to stock large quantities of the newspaper today
definitely - the digital age just means the music itself is a cheap-as-chips, often free commodity. that's definitely the challenge grime faces: how to use the music to sell other things (at the moment just boy better know t-shirts)..
so the songs become glorified adverts/jingles?
No one seems to have picked up on the fact that Prince - these days being something of a religious man with a message to get across - will not have looked at this purely from a business angle (even though its a very smart move). He's very happy to have a couple of million people listen to his words about God, etc. I'd say that was a major factor.
One of my biggest regrets is that I didn't go to see Prince when he did the Parade tour in 1986.
I could have bought tickets but spent my money elsewhere instead: you know how its is when you're young. Then he missed the UK with Sign of The Times and didn't come back to play until 1988 with Lovesexy. I saw that tour but I sort of knew I'd missed him at his peak - I've been kicking myself ever since.
Is he in that position? I somehow thought he was selling practically no records, sorry CDs, in recent years (based vaguely on the fact that he was creatively washed up and never in the charts any more)?
bit of an old thread but just noticed this. I'd hardly call an artist washed up whos last three albums have gone Top 3 in the US charts....3121 actually went to No 1 and all except this free one went Top 10 in the UK too