luka

Well-known member
But we could also argue that the appropriate/acceptable intensity is constitutive of a given ideology. The belief that one can go too far.

Yes i knew you would say this but I want to make the distinction. I want to say that mode of being and spectrum of affects is prior to and distinct from ideology.
 

constant escape

winter withered, warm
Yes i knew you would say this but I want to make the distinction. I want to say that mode of being and spectrum of affects is prior to and distinct from ideology.
Perhaps, if you define ideology as a formal sort of label that you place yourself under. I define as this, as well as the specific/unique set of values that one would be conforming to the standards of the category.
 

luka

Well-known member
A self, an experience of self, is partly what we are capable of experiencing, what we are set up to experience, what spectrum of affects, what can get in and register and act upon us, what thoughts occur etc
and it is also how we police the space in which experience happens, what we allow to happen there, what we try to prevent from happening
 

constant escape

winter withered, warm
Okay I think I see your point.

I just use "ideology" to refer to both the values that feel organic and indicative of your nature, as well as those that you force yourself to comply with.

That said, both instances are maps, rather than territory. You define/articulate your organic values in reference to the values defined/articulated around you, and you define/articulate the value you force yourself to uphold in reference to those around you.
 

constant escape

winter withered, warm
So I'm not saying that the locus of experience, the psychic singularity, is reducible to values,

but I tend to think the self, as a socially defined/reified map, is reducible to values.
 

luka

Well-known member
I'm interested in how you get trapped in this or that self

Similar to that Burroughs line, who scared you into time into body into shit.
How do we get trapped in these selves without range of movement, a neurotic self, say. A frigid self, a frightened self.
 

luka

Well-known member
I think this is not so much a question which comes under the rubric of ideology as it is more to do with the effects of social violence
 

luka

Well-known member
So I would argue against self, as a socially defined/reified map, being reducible to values as to a large degree it is a product of scar tissue. Injuries and adaptation to injuries.
 
I just use "ideology" to refer to both the values that feel organic and indicative of your nature, as well as those that you force yourself to comply with.

this conversation is moving a bit fast but ill interject and say reading this reminded my of the - i think zizek thing- ideology operating at its most pure when we think we're outside it

‘The form of consciousness that fits late-capitalist “post-ideological” society – the cynical, “sober” attitude that advocates liberal “openness” in the matter of “opinions” (everybody is free to believe whatever she or he wants; this concerns only his or her privacy), disregards pathetic ideological phrases, and follows only utilitarian and/or hedonistic motivations – stricto sensu remains an ideological attitude: it involves a series of ideological presuppositions (on the relationship between “values” and “real life”, on personal freedom, etc.) that are necessary for the reproduction of existing social relations’
 

luka

Well-known member
How do you get trapped in a self which can't move past a certain point in any given direction? You as in us, you, me, everybody, we are all occupying botched selves, crippled in all sorts of ways
 
Top