luka

Well-known member
its mad the things people get excited about isnt it. i was just looking at some of my favourite twitter nerds and theyre having this furious argument about Trotsky. like, who the fuck is Trotsky? didnt he die about 2 million years ago? who cares
 

shakahislop

Well-known member
what is it that makes ordinary white english men decide to become middle east experts? and just go on the internet loads 'learning' about
middle east stuff? i suppose its just a hobby like any other, no real harm in it

more seriously: for me it's because i was involved in this war for a long time, which leads to a kind of obsessive interest, and what's going on now is affecting a lot of my friends there (but i don't know if you're talking about me).

more generally i've often wondered the same thing. i always had a bit of a distaste for the international relations students at university. always felt there was something off about their motivations, it felt a bit like worldly penis measuring to me. i've also come across random internet people who are dead into middle eastern conflicts. not many in real life since university though. it's......it's not just a hobby is it. there's something happening at the level of desire. attaching your emotions to a distant place that's more an intellectual object than a real one. i guess also with the middle east in particular there's the disgust and demonstration of disgust with 'american foreign policy'. or british foreign policy. and the orientalist thing, obvs.
 

shakahislop

Well-known member
I've noticed this with a fair few 'online leftists' from the US. The hatred of their own state seems to override everything.
it's basically an extrapolation of their own feelings about the US isn't it. I mean it's fair enough, it is an emotionally / affectively speaking weird place to be i reckon. but ultimately it's not about the 'middle east' itself. at least not at an emotional level.
 

luka

Well-known member
its a recognition thatt the us led empire is by far and away the most powerful and influential actor and to resist it is heroic in and of itself regardless of motivation, ie even if evil
 

luka

Well-known member
corpsey and bill gates are equally evil by nature but they have vastly divergent spheres of influence
 

shakahislop

Well-known member
It's another example of American exceptionalism really. The idea that America's uniquely evil.
dead on. even with the afghanistan thing, where america has been.....i mean words fail me, it's hard to describe the level of contempt i have for what they've done - the government of pakistan is really what brings me to the point of disgust. i guess the discourse is a 90s hangover, from when america really was a superpower
 

Clinamenic

Binary & Tweed
It is strange. My primary sources of news are panels at think tanks and newsletters from think tanks, like CSIS, and there is this prevailing and often purely implicit tone of hegemonic maintenance, like if another state-level actor ascends, in terms of influence, without guidance from the U.S., they are treated like a threat.

Which isn;t to say they shouldn't be, its just interesting that there is something of a complex that forms around being generally pro-establishment in a nation like the U.S.

I am presently situated in the pro-establishment left quadrant, for the most part. I tend to think there is something to be said for having a limb in all four quadrants: pro/anti establishment, left/right cultural persuasion.
 
Top