Search results

haha exactly that

we're all gonna be in our little yt holes, except we're not gonna be watching content made by anyone - instead its intentionless garbage that ticks some statistical box which satisfies the underlying algorithm. that's the ultimate end state

maybe this is bad

but its taking over anyway

AI already determines what media you consume - the next step is having it create it as well, completely removing humans from the loop

surely by definition it will be maximally engaging, since that's the entire purpose of the AI. its already here in the form of recommendation engines. are they effective, do you think?

imagine an app like tiktok except the content is AI generated. what's the significance?

what's the problem

I've been pretty clear I think

that's the issue

theres a point where it doesnt matter

this is already happening to a significant extent

yes but

question is what role should culture play. if it's all ai generated and devoid of intentionality, is it still culture or does it become something else

internet 3.0 as solipsism 101 basically. is this ok?

imagine an ai version of tiktok, where no one has created the video, pushing it in front of a human face, forever

you: can I have neurolink inserted in brain pls me: is this a good idea you: technological change is a constant for the last two hundred years

yes so algorithmic mediation of culture is kind of new isnt it, that wasnt present in the 19th century although technological development was

specifically I'm thinking about recommendation engines in the context of social media. but in general this is an old critique, which goes back to heidegger at least

I dont think machine sentience is on the cards any time soon, but greater amounts of machine automation certainly is