Search results

Come to think of it, where's my statue?

Is this your working solution, or your final one?

But, my liege, is it not grandiose to expect love and attention the world over? Are our adoring and beneficent eyes not enough?

CoMit

Anyway, it seems we're on the same page there, or at least close enough.

Because that larger trajectory isn't identifiable from the perspective of one of its branch trajectories. Thats what I meant that the meta-ideological optimal will likely just register as another ideological position, when it is actually better described as a higher order projection of all...

Yeah I see what you mean, that all moves are made in accordance to some thorough-going backbone that stitches together otherwise separate situations. Its largely what comes to mind when I think about systems of a higher order than the human psyche. Cultures, fads, ideologies, states, etc.

The consistency part trips me up. Do you mean consistently productive? Or consistent - static - in ones psychic expression?

A proper horizon, given the proper engine for taking pains.

But for me, part of the rigor is how much you are willing to indulge the vulgar, phenomenal realm. Enough to take science seriously? Yeah, I think thats the best way I can detect here, and I can argue the same, the other way around.

That certainly has its prospects, if it is to be embarked on with the required rigor.

Lotta room for rhetoric, but I also think its a skill that can be trained.

Hey hey I certainly don't dismiss such possibilities, but I'm also trying to factor in the plausibility of actually getting a theory some traction. Along similar lines as a sort of hyperstitional effort would be, processing a possible reality into an actual reality.

But what if we extend the logic of the power-prior-to-enfranchisement theory a bit further, to the point where institutions become veritable puppets for effectively private parties, with the official government's power being somewhat academic compared to the real power of said parties. Not...

@mixed_biscuits Power prior to enfranchisement, rather than enfranchisement prior to power? Sure its a feedback loop, but do you tend to view enfranchisement being enabled gradually by power? I think that gets right at the heart of certain discussions here about what organized bodies of humans...

Yeah it says your name right under it.

A slow, visceral descent into libidinal barbarism. I'll hang back and take notes.

Some good instincts you got there @version

Something tells me such guerrilla revisionism won't meet the erotic success it deserves.

Something tells me such guerrilla revisionism won't meet the erotic success it deserves. edit: wow wrong thread