maybe b/c as an american i didn't really know where Gaul was...)
Umm...France? It wasn't that hard to work out.
maybe b/c as an american i didn't really know where Gaul was...)
they're totally different things, why compare? i get equal amounts of pleasure from each. tintin is wonderful. very atmospheric. great characters. tintin, calculus, haddock, thompson twins.... amazing plots, wonderfully drawn... asterix has better puns but so what? actually fuck it...tintin is better... more depth...the one in peru (children of the sun? is it a two parter?) with the mummy gave me nightmares... red rackhams treasure is incredible story telling...the artwork is incomparably better...
I mean, that's not a great example of Uderzo you chose there, Matt b.
Have a look at Asterix in Switzerland, Asterix in Corsica, Obelix & Co., Asterix and the Great Crossing, examples of Uderzo's high style.
They're not twins though, they're called Thomson and Thompson."Also, the Thompson Twins show up in Asterix in Belgium"
Philip Pullman: "I like Tintin's blandness, his blankness, his lack of depth; he is an empty page on which adventures can be drawn."Oliver, I like Asterix a lot- I'm not a hater, but you can't deny that Asterix is a much busier series graphically. I prefer the stripped back elegance of Herge.
Yeah, amazing stuff. How do they make the names all have the same endings and yet have a meaning that still (presumably) corresponds to the original meaning?