online chess is great for kids - you got to work out how that knight moves or it won't let you move it!Like a lot of people, I've got back into chess via the online thing since lockdown, although I've come to realize that I kind of find it more enjoyable in the abstract than in practice, as in, I really enjoy analyzing and understanding the game, solving puzzles and so on, but trying to find the right moves under pressure does my head in a bit.
One thing that has struck me, though, is how much difference the internet must have made to people starting out. Like, when I was a kid I played a few games once or twice a week and had a random assortment of second hand books to learn from. It must be a fairly different experience now you can basically hammer out games any time you want and access all sorts of information online.
Haha, really? I'm flattered but I'm also pretty bad at chess.no I'm intimidated by you, I need a rival who I can quench in my search for self-esteem and victory
Now that's true sportsmanship!Only played it once, lost humiliatingly and took it badly.
Not really, no. I do have a correspondence chess title (Senior International Master) but I've hardly played any serious CC in fifteen years. Just ten games in the Counties & District League (bd.1 for Nottinghamshire).@subvert47 - you're mostly a correspondence player, though, right?
isn't this cheating though as you could easily look up the answers@subvert47 - you're mostly a correspondence player, though, right?
looking things up is part of the gameisn't this cheating though as you could easily look up the answers
When you say looking things up, do you mean like "Ah, this is just like the game between Bolokov and Pimpski in 1956" and opening a book that describes that game?looking things up is part of the game![]()
When you say looking things up, do you mean like "Ah, this is just like the game between Bolokov and Pimpski in 1956" and opening a book that describes that game?
As opposed to feeding the moves into a chess program, which would pretty unequivocally count as cheating, I'd have thought.
Yeah, I know it was a huge moment in both the chess and computer science worlds when Deep Blue beat Kasparov, but I find it quite depressing to think that a chess app that runs on a smartphone can now easily thrash even the best human players.Correspondence chess is about analysis. You can use all sorts of tools to assist you in your analysis... books, databases, engines, your own previous analysis. Most CC organizations allow all of those. So, no, it's not cheating.
But engines (chess programs) are why I gave up playing CC seriously. They took all of the fun out of it for me. And that was 15 years ago. They're much stronger now. Stronger than the world champion even. Much stronger.
![]()
006. The Game of Analysis
White: AndyAndyO - thematic tournament, ChessWorld.net, 2016 Most over-the-board players I've spoken to about correspondence chess regard...200opengames.blogspot.com
Yeah, I know it was a huge moment in both the chess and computer science worlds when Deep Blue beat Kasparov, but I find it quite depressing to think that a chess app that runs on a smartphone can now easily thrash even the best human players.
why is there only one? is the hardware very expensiveThe AI works on more important things now, serious science projects. Last year, apparently, it made a major breakthrough in protein folding.
good question. dunnowhy is there only one? is the hardware very expensive