john eden
male pale and stale
I think before you can answer 'what is middle class?', you have to ask - and then answer, or at least attempt to figure out - 'what is class?'.
.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_class
I think before you can answer 'what is middle class?', you have to ask - and then answer, or at least attempt to figure out - 'what is class?'.
.
How handy! I really dunno why people bother debating about stuff like the meaning of life and the existence of God when they could just look it up on Wikipedia.![]()
what really fascinates me is the whole linkage between the minutiae of accents/modes of speech and perceived class - as if 'you can earn whatever you want, but we'll still know what you really are, you can't hide it'...
There are several definitions of class on that page, which do you disagree with least? (Bearing in mind you actually brought up the need to define class on the last page of this thread, as if it was some kind of elusive mystery).
This I think is related to the weird kind of prejudice/resentment that working-class people can sometimes display towards members of their own family who've 'made good' and gone up a rung or two on the economic ladder (regardless of whether said relative has started 'putting on airs and graces' or otherwise acting 'posh'). I think this might have happened a little in my own family, with some elderly female relatives on my dad's side. There's that bizarre phrase, "S/he's no better than s/he ought to be", I mean what the fuck does that actually mean?
I think this is very true, but I'm not sure that it's specifically used by middle class people against working class people so much as by people higher up the general class ladder against people lower down - there are so many gradations and subdivisions these days that it's not clear whether it's still helpful to talk about it in terms of that binary.But I was thinking more of the way in which this is used by the middle classes against working class people who have 'transcended their station' - the whole obsession in the UK with the 'nouveau riche' is I guess the most obvious example of it.
The thing about 'nouveau riche' is that when people from backgrounds that have never had much money suddenly find themselves very wealthy, the results can be aesthetically disastrous.
This probably appallingly snobbish, but you know it's true.
it IS snobbish and essentialising! People who have always been in money often have appalling taste too - conspicuous consumption goes wrong in all kinds of ways.
serving ridiculously small portions of stuff, for example, is still something bizarrely associated with expensive, 'classy' restaurants. Whereas it's just risible, annoying and shit.
it IS snobbish and essentialising! People who have always been in money often have appalling taste too - conspicuous consumption goes wrong in all kinds of ways.
Which I suppose may be the nub, that to let people know you've got money in a way that also shows you're having fun is supposedly 'vulgar'; whereas all that's different is that people who've had money all their lives have had a lifetime to think about ways in which to demonstrate their wealth in more 'elegant' ways. Which are often themselves appalling and hilarious, and very rarely elegant - serving ridiculously small portions of stuff, for example, is still something bizarrely associated with expensive, 'classy' restaurants. Whereas it's just risible, annoying and shit.
serving ridiculously small portions of stuff, for example, is still something bizarrely associated with expensive, 'classy' restaurants. Whereas it's just risible, annoying and shit.
i thought the big white plate/small amount of food thing was the epitome of nouveau riche
i must be really posh
Ha, why did you delete that post? It's true, there are guys who are 'technically' the Laird of Skye or whatever whose family fell on hard times in the last century and now they run an estate agency or manage a small shop. There was a massive depopulation of the old aristocracy after WWI, after all.
Playing devil's advocate here, but surely expensive foodie type restaurants have got way past any illusion that the amount you're paying is proportional to the amount of sustenance you get? You're paying for a load of amazing combinations of flavor, texture and presentation and it's actually no more rational to be annoyed at having to fork out an extra pound twenty for a bag of chips on the way home than it would to be annoyed that you're still hungry after a gig...I thought it'd died out tbh, but last two meals I had at expensive, classic foodie-type restaurants, left feeling hungry. Utter shite.