i always admired the conspiracy nutters way of watching films. theyd always detect the hidden symbolism in a way that made me feel really stupid. it would always be about transhumanism and monarch programming, every single time.
I was reading story of the eye. It might have been broached in there but I also might be confusing it with some secondary stuff I was reading on it, either way dont have any in depth thing to recomend.Do you remember where by chance? V relevant to my research
I finished moby dick a couple days ago. Feel like the book mocks you with its ending as its a sort of an anti climax that reminds you all of ahabs monologues are insane ramblings, which you knew, but he spends so long intoxicating you with them that its a bit jarring when theres really no dramatic final battle between him and the whale. Moby dick swats them away like flies for a few days and then pops ahabs head off when hes finally annoyed enough to pay him mind. So much for destiny
Theres alot of gnosticism in the first half of the book where hes explicity raging against the material worldA gnostic would probably view the whale as the demiurge or an archon. Ahab has his monologue about striking through the mask, escaping the prison. His was always a futile quest as he was waging a one-man war against the universe.
Of course they coasted off charisma, cult of personality, etc
Which is why said attributes should be treated as red flags
Theres alot of gnosticism in the first half of the book where hes explicity raging against the material world
I think you chose a dicey example, Cassady was a sociopathYou've got the logic back to the front here though. Just cos Ted Bundy was charismatic, it doesn't mean that all charismatic people are Ted Bundy... some of them are Neal Cassady.
The fire worship also reads gnostic. The tryworks are the 'divine spark' of the Pequod. And the part with St elmos fire:"All visible objects, man, are but as pasteboard masks. But in each event—in the living act, the undoubted deed—there, some unknown but still reasoning thing puts forth the mouldings of its features from behind the unreasoning mask. If man will strike, strike through the mask! How can the prisoner reach outside except by thrusting through the wall? To me, the white whale is that wall, shoved near to me. Sometimes I think there’s naught beyond. But ’tis enough."
Perhaps another dicey example.eg Stan is hardly a psychopath is he?
I am pleased this threadis now populated by Melville-esque characters - confidence men and lightning-rod men; self-inventors. I’d recommend The Lightng-Rod Man, it’s very short and simultaneously confusing and illuminating.