You should expound on this in a book.This is the wrong thread for that particular discussion, but yes, all radical publishing is essentially narcissistic intellectual oneupmanship masquerading as the development ("praxis") of a morally authoritive position on politics and aesthetics.
Shiels have you read Dostoevsky?might as well extend that to all literature too - books are products, but can they be all that and change how we see things, develop ideas etc. course!
I'll short them all the way to the Siberian gulag where they belong, the charlatans.rudewhy should short repeater books.
Shiels have you read Dostoevsky?