Trump

mixed_biscuits

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
Seeing as the Boers were around before SA was established (by the Boers!), agitating for their "decolonisation" is clearly many white Americans' way of saying that they should be expelled to return North America to its antecedent mono-ethnic state...but will the British bourgeois give asylum to you?
 
T

thirdform

pass the sick bucket
mixed_biscuits said:
Seeing as the Boers were around before SA was established (by the Boers!), agitating for their "decolonisation" is clearly many white Americans' way of saying that they should be expelled to return North America to its antecedent mono-ethnic state...but will the British bourgeois give asylum to you?
Click to expand...

I didn't know you were infatuated with Americans. that's another strike against you.
 
G

germaphobian

Well-known member
hmg said:
View attachment 22722
Click to expand...

it's strange that for many Africans the names and the last names are the same . wouldn't it make sense to just call yourself Mampuru insted of doubling it? or to make at least a tiny change, like Mapuru Mapururu, for example? it would be the same if someone was named John John or Gareth Gareth; very confusing, especially for getting any sort of paperwork done.
 
Mr. Tea

Mr. Tea

Let's Talk About Ceps
germaphobian said:
it's strange that for many Africans the names and the last names are the same . wouldn't it make sense to just call yourself Mampuru insted of doubling it? or to make at least a tiny change, like Mapuru Mapururu, for example? it would be the same if someone was named John John or Gareth Gareth; very confusing, especially for getting any sort of paperwork done.
Click to expand...
You're going down on his list for saying that.
 
O

okzharp

Well-known member
mixed_biscuits said:
It doubtless meets the ICC criteria!

Perhaps you'd be more inclined to consider it a genocide if the farmers had been on a murderous rampage, following a manifesto to rid the world of black South Africans.
Click to expand...
You must realise that what you describe isn't a hypothetical scenario? The state-sanctioned white-on-black murderous rampage actually happened in the preceding decades, right?

Except the white/afrikaans farmers didn't want to get rid of the blacks, did they? They wanted to systematically displace, enslave and exploit them.

But apartheid ended 35 whole years ago - these blacks can't get themselves organised, can they? They're all corrupt? And generational trauma is a fiction, right?

To wit - 35 years on, white/afrikaans people make up about 8% of the economically active population, but control about 70-odd% of the economy. White/afrikaans people have it pretty good. It should probably be uncontroversial to expect white/afrikaans people to support (or at least accept) a more energised wealth redistribution project from their democratically elected government.

The EFF are useful idiots for the ANC. If anything, they have allowed the ANC to go SLOWER on certain things. In the same way that people like Mark Francois were useful idiots for Johnson to justify not actually doing anything. The reliably cartoonish extremist, allowing you to appear moderate and strategic and level-headed. And those 59 fast-tracked farmers have been successfully weaponized to inflame tedious embittered liberal-fascist cranks in the US.

Violence is out of control in SA. But black on black violence MASSIVELY eclipses the black on white violence.

oh and I saw something that said the average black family in SA has about 5% of the wealth of the average white/afrikaans family. In the US it's about 6%! So Elon's all up in Mister President's ear, and the Don's getting tetchy, and in brazen indifference to the complex sociocultural SA contexts he lobs in the G word. As long as we address the problem over there, we can distract from the obvious problem over here. It's all pathetic and probably quite effective domestically, and it's all entirely consistent with the Trump administration's isolationist myopia and grubby, ham-minded, destructively-exothermic statecraft.

Oh and guess who's financing SA infrastructure development - and all the mineral mines - now that ye old white/afrikaans hegemony is starting to disintegrate? Chinaaargh. Bet Elon wants a share of all that cobalt etc
 
mixed_biscuits

mixed_biscuits

_________________________
okzharp said:
You must realise that what you describe isn't a hypothetical scenario? The state-sanctioned white-on-black murderous rampage actually happened in the preceding decades, right?

Except the white/afrikaans farmers didn't want to get rid of the blacks, did they? They wanted to systematically displace, enslave and exploit them.

But apartheid ended 35 whole years ago - these blacks can't get themselves organised, can they? They're all corrupt? And generational trauma is a fiction, right?

To wit - 35 years on, white/afrikaans people make up about 8% of the economically active population, but control about 70-odd% of the economy. White/afrikaans people have it pretty good. It should probably be uncontroversial to expect white/afrikaans people to support (or at least accept) a more energised wealth redistribution project from their democratically elected government.

The EFF are useful idiots for the ANC. If anything, they have allowed the ANC to go SLOWER on certain things. In the same way that people like Mark Francois were useful idiots for Johnson to justify not actually doing anything. The reliably cartoonish extremist, allowing you to appear moderate and strategic and level-headed. And those 59 fast-tracked farmers have been successfully weaponized to inflame tedious embittered liberal-fascist cranks in the US.

Violence is out of control in SA. But black on black violence MASSIVELY eclipses the black on white violence.

oh and I saw something that said the average black family in SA has about 5% of the wealth of the average white/afrikaans family. In the US it's about 6%! So Elon's all up in Mister President's ear, and the Don's getting tetchy, and in brazen indifference to the complex sociocultural SA contexts he lobs in the G word. As long as we address the problem over there, we can distract from the obvious problem over here. It's all pathetic and probably quite effective domestically, and it's all entirely consistent with the Trump administration's isolationist myopia and grubby, ham-minded, destructively-exothermic statecraft.

Oh and guess who's financing SA infrastructure development - and all the mineral mines - now that ye old white/afrikaans hegemony is starting to disintegrate? Chinaaargh. Bet Elon wants a share of all that cobalt etc
Click to expand...
Okay, so you concede the genocide point while presenting a big mess: the mess of the situation over there, the mess of your "moral reasoning", and then some sort of conspiracy theory.
 
T

thirdform

pass the sick bucket
mixed_biscuits said:
Okay, so you concede the genocide point while presenting a big mess: the mess of the situation over there, the mess of your "moral reasoning", and then some sort of conspiracy theory.
Click to expand...

You are the flaccid custodian of liberal fatigue. A biscuit left in tea too long — soft, bloated, structurally useless.
 
T

thirdform

pass the sick bucket
hmg said:
The left is utterly fucked, scrambling, panicking, in total disarray.Every petard a hoist. And it's beautiful.
Click to expand...

You are right, however not for the reasons you have generated in your mentally defective nonce-core strawberry field of a thing resembling the residue of a mind.

I wouldn't be too hasty to blow your load, if I were you. The old left is fucked, but the new left has already emerged. I am afraid to report that incontinent eejits such as yourself have not even seen the beginning of woke yet. This I can claim not as an opinion but with absolute certainty.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top