And when I think of schizoanalytic criticism, I think of issuing several theses at the text from different ideological positions. I'm only familiar with how Deleuze and Guattari describe it in the first section of A Thousand Plateaus, where they distinguish it from the traditional/orthodox psychoanalytic approach. They say that the tradition approach works toward identifying a single, underlying root cause, or making a central diagnosis, whereas schizoanalysis works toward expanding/pushing the various branches of the complex, preserving its many-headedness and contradictions rather than reconciling them all together. Maybe I'm bringing stuff to the table that wasn't ordered, but in any case I find it all fascinating.
One's a creative technique coined by an artist, the other's a disparaging label imposed by a critic.
Good to know, I don't think I would have come to that conclusion. I've only read Wallace's
The Broom of the System, which seems to be aptly described by hysterical realism, but it could very well not extend to his other works. Don't know anything about DeLillo, though.