Cambridge Analytica + Psyops + The Beast

D

droid

Well-known member
So, in a sense, this is a real world result of the CA revelations and pressure on online multinationals.

I think repeal wouldve won anyway, but this potentially pushes the margin up from 51% to 60% as well as breaking the back of decades of the regressive influence of ultra right catholic organisations on the social and legislative spheres.
 
D

droid

Well-known member
Sorry to bang on, but its hilarious to watch the scum go mental over this. They must've spent millions on videos and ads and now its all for naught. They're now complaining of foreign interference and saying that this is liberal multinationals trying to rig the referendum for Soros.

If you had any idea of just how corrosive, dirty and evil these fuckers are you'd be laughing too.
 
D

droid

Well-known member
Looks like this is gonna pass tomorrow. Small fry to you colonials, but the culmination of decades of activism here.
 
D

droid

Well-known member
Scratch that. Biggest exit poll tonight, first exit poll now saying 68-32% for yes. This is momentous.
 
padraig (u.s.)

padraig (u.s.)

a monkey that will go ape
congrats to you all in the auld country

from pre-vote coverage I saw it seemed like a Yes vote was almost definitely in the bag but I'm sure the landslide is welcome
 
D

droid

Well-known member
Well, I was fairly confident, but the campaign was filthy and there's a loooong history here of those kinda tactics sowing discord. This has been going on for almost my entire life.

Hard to explain how huge this is if one isn't familiar with the background. A grassroots feminist activist movement took on entrenched lobby & establishment groups, US evangelical money & electoral infrastructure, fake news, dodgy digital ads, and alt right & far right orgs from the UK and Europe, and not only beat them, but OBLITERATED them. They will never recover from this.
 
D

droid

Well-known member
OTOH we weathered all the dirty tricks and filthy money and held firm, so I have to wonder what that says about the UK & US.
 
D

DannyL

Wild Horses
Congratulations! I wonder if you see any counter reaction somewhere down the line? hard to imagine what'd look like right now, in wake of such a decisive victory.
 
D

droid

Well-known member
Oh, theyre already trying to rewrite history. Problem for them is theyve thrown every bit of shit they can at this one and they get weaker every time they lose so we're more or less immune now.

Next steps are extending the abortion campaign to Northern Ireland, ending Church patronage of the schools (dont ask) and then right to die.

Hopefully we'll have a half liveable country by the time the climate apocalypse hits.
 
luka

luka

Well-known member
"SCL Group provides data, analytics and strategy to governments and military organisations worldwide" reads the first line of its website. "For over 25 years, we have conducted behavioural change programmes in over 60 countries & have been formally recognised for our work in defence and social change.”

WHO IS THE TETRAD MANAGER?
 
luka

luka

Well-known member
i keep trying to explain the basics to you lot but youre so slow to catch on. i reckon it will take you another 3 or 4 years to work out what's been happening.
 
D

droid

Well-known member
droid said:
This hit right at the end of the first Q, lets see what happens at the end of June.
Click to expand...

Ahem.

Facebook investors reeling after 20% share price tumble

...But Facebook’s executives then shocked investors by revealing disappointing second-quarter earnings and forecasts. Its shares tumbled as much as 24 per cent, wiping up to $140bn off the company’s value, in one of the largest after-market drops ever.

https://www.ft.com/content/84a9e6c8-9075-11e8-b639-7680cedcc421
Click to expand...
 
firefinga

firefinga

Well-known member
After watching a documentary on Mercer and his connections to Cambridge Analytica on French TV (!) I am rather convinced they actually DID score the presidency for Trump. They showed very plausibly how they operated - picked the few "battle gound" states where they were able to influence enough voters to get Trump the small lead. The true crux of the american presidential eletion seems to be the outdated mode of the electoral college. Popular vote is the way to go.
 
version

version

Well-known member
This should be a bigger story. The consensus seems to be that they're worried about being forced to disclose the source of their funding so they're copping to everything in order to avoid the case going to court - https://www.theguardian.com/politic...axpayers-alliance-concedes-it-launched-smears

TaxPayers’ Alliance concedes it launched smears against Brexit whistleblower

The rightwing pressure group the TaxPayers’ Alliance has conceded that it illegally sacked the whistleblower Shahmir Sanni for revealing unlawful overspending in the Brexit referendum campaign, in a case that could have a major impact on how lobbyists are described in the media.

In a development that lawyers have described as “almost unprecedented”, the group has also conceded that it illegally vilified Sanni on the BBC in coordination with a network of other “linked” organisations.

The alliance has accepted all the allegations Sanni made during his action claiming unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, direct discrimination and “dismissal by reason of a philosophical belief in the sanctity of British democracy”. Significantly, it has also conceded that it is liable for what Sanni’s lawyer, Peter Daly of Bindmans, describes as “extreme public vilification”. Sanni had claimed that it was responsible for a smear attack published by the website Brexit Central, and that it coordinated “derogatory statements” made by the head of Vote Leave, Matthew Elliott, to the BBC – calling Sanni a “Walter Mitty fantasist” and “so-called whistleblower” and claiming that he was guilty of “completely lying” – before an official finding by the Electoral Commission into the conduct of the Brexit referendum.

The disclosure is likely to have far-reaching consequences for the way that broadcasters describe lobby groups. The uncontested claim has stated that the TaxPayers’ Alliance is responsible for Elliott’s Brexit Central website as part of nine “linked” high-profile rightwing “thinktanks” that operate in and around offices at 55 Tufton Street in Westminster and coordinate media and other strategy.

In Sanni’s case, they also coordinated with Downing Street.

The network includes the Adam Smith Institute, the Centre for Policy Studies, the Institute of Economic Affairs and Leave Means Leave. The shadow chancellor, John McDonnell, is calling for a full inquiry into the groups’ funding and said that in the interests of “openness and accountability” the BBC must make clear they are lobbyists, not thinktanks” as they are sometimes referred to.

In March, Sanni revealed to the Observer massive overspending by the official Vote Leave campaign, which has now been found to be in breach of the law by the Electoral Commission. The day before this was published, Downing Street released a statement that revealed Sanni was gay, and the TaxPayers’ Alliance subsequently sacked him from his job running its social media. It has now conceded in full Sanni’s claims and is liable to pay substantial damages. Details of the alliance’s relationship with Downing Street and the role of Stephen Parkinson, Theresa May’s political secretary, will now not be heard in court. A separate claim by Sanni against Downing Street is still ongoing. Sanni, who received an award from Gay Times last week, said: “It has proved that the TaxPayers’ Alliance sacked me for speaking the truth. And that there has been a coordinated effort by the Conservative establishment, including the government, to shut me down.

“The TPA claimed to have lost a donor because of my actions. If they had fought the case in court as we wanted, they would have had to reveal who their donors are. That they were prepared to admit their illegal behaviour on all counts shows how far they are willing to go to protect this information. “Serious questions must be asked about who is funding them, what their exact relationship is with the government and why are they allowed a platform on national television.”

Chris Milsom, a barrister who specialises in whistleblowing cases, said: “It is incredibly unusual for a respondent to make a complete concession on liability as the respondent has here. To wave a white flag to avoid disclosing documents and giving evidence in court is really unusual. They conceded everything. How does an ostensibly private company come to be working with Downing Street? What is their relationship? Who are their funders? “If this had been fully ventilated in a public trial we could have found these things out. The effect of these admissions, however, is that Mr Sanni was dismissed both because he blew the whistle on electoral crimes and because of his philosophical belief in the sanctity of democracy. We must now ask: is that an entity that is fit to be on the BBC ostensibly speaking on behalf of all ‘taxpayers’?”

McDonnell said: “We need full transparency in who is operating in our political system and therefore seeking to influence both our elections but also our governmental policymaking. These organisations – even by their names – seek to portray themselves as independent, authoritative research bodies.” In reality, he said, they were “virtual lobbyists” but never presented as such by the BBC and others.

At the time of publication, the TaxPayers’ Alliance had not responded to the Observer’s request for comment.
 
version

version

Well-known member

Channel 4 News
‏Verified account @Channel4News

"That's libellous, you can't put this online, my friend.”

Brexit Party MEP Alexandra Phillips denies working for Cambridge Analytica in Kenya, speaking to @Channel4News.

A few days later she admitted working for the firm's parent company.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top