I know they're unoccupied and done up for the tour, but 'sterile' is one word which comes to mind looking at these places. They don't look as though you could ever really live in them or that they're even designed to be lived in. They look made to be empty.
It's mad that that one costs 135m and this one's only 12...
Currently for sale and by far Europe's most expensive home at approximately $456 million, the connecting bubbles representing one room each, is spread over six levels on 1.75 acres on a cliff with 180-degree-views over the Mediterranean.
What's the medication? Bumhole fingering?its true actors and entertainers are the lowest of the low. in a future more just society it will be classified as a mental derangement and they will be medicated properly
i've read this exact thing about the Trump gold 'n' glitz aestheticOne problem, what you could possibly call these properties' ostentatiousness, is that they often go for uber-legible symbols of wealth, shit that would be appealing to Joe Plumber—a bowling alley, to pair with your six pack! Endless candy dispensers! A grand piano!
i thought this went for most of the new builds in London as well?"investment opportunities" which are never intended to be lived in, just assets to be held on to and then sold at a profit
youve never been to colorado
I like a viewI would hate to live so high up
Michale jordan famously has this massive house that wont sell because its truly hideous![]()
This is a bit like the caste system in Hinduism, where the priest caste is designated as the head and the kingly/warrior cast is designated as the arms and chest. So the (poor) priest are higher up in the chain than the (rich) Kings and in fact money is considered a pollutant. All that has changed, if you follow this line, is that we've swapped closeness to God for aesthetics.Bourdieu spends an entire book (Distinction) trying to say this, but you've managed to sum it up in a sentence. The structure of fields makes both high taste and high economic earnings a near impossibility.
child sacrifice architecture on that on
i've read this exact thing about the Trump gold 'n' glitz aesthetic
![]()
or indeed for capital, which is why i'm always saying the tallest buildings in the city used to be churches and cathedrals, now they're the office blockswe've swapped closeness to God for aesthetics.
They're still temples, mate - temples to Mammon.or indeed for capital, which is why i'm always saying the tallest buildings in the city used to be churches and cathedrals, now they're the office blocks
you should cut down on that stuff tea*passes spliff*
As long as it also turns me into a world-famous poet, I'm OK with that.i think it's turning you into some kind of paranoid, conspiracy theorist!